Water Consumption and Water-Saving Characteristics of a Ground Cover Rice Production System

Xinxin Jin,Qiang Zuo,Wenwen Ma,Sen Li,Jianchu Shi,Yueyue Tao,Yanan Zhang,Yang Liu,Xiaofei Liu,Shan Lin,Alon Ben-Gal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.018
IF: 6.4
2016-01-01
Journal of Hydrology
Abstract:The ground cover rice production system (GCRPS) offers a potentially water-saving alternative to the traditional paddy rice production system (TPRPS) by furrow irrigating mulched soil beds and maintaining soils under predominately unsaturated conditions. The guiding hypothesis of this study was that a GCRPS would decrease both physiological and non-physiological water consumption of rice compared to a TPRPS while either maintaining or enhancing production. This was tested in a two-year field experiment with three treatments (TPRPS, GCRPS(sat) keeping root zone average soil water content near saturated, and GCRPS8(0%) keeping root zone average soil water content as 80-100% of field water capacity) and a greenhouse experiment with four treatments (TPRPS, GCRPS(sat), GCRPS(fwc) keeping root zone average soil water content close to field water capacity, and GCRPS(80%)). The water-saving characteristics of GCRPS were analyzed as a function of the measured soil water conditions, plant parameters regarding growth and production, and water input and consumption. In the field experiment, significant reduction in both physiological and non-physiological water consumption under GCRPS lead to savings in irrigation water of similar to 61-84% and reduction in total input water of similar to 35-47%. Compared to TPRPS, deep drainage was reduced similar to 72-88%, evaporation was lessened similar to 83-89% and transpiration was limited similar to 6-10% under GCRPS. In addition to saving water, plant growth and grain yield were enhanced under GCRPS due to increased soil temperature in the root zone. Therefore, water use efficiencies (WUEs), based on transpiration, irrigation and total input water, were respectively improved as much as 27%, 609% and 110% under GCRPS. Increased yield attributed to up to similar to 19%, decreased deep drainage accounted for similar to 75%, decreased evaporation accounted for similar to 14% and reduced transpiration for similar to 5% of the enhancement in WUE of input water under GCRPS, while increased runoff and water storage had negative influence on WUE (-7.5 and-3.7%, respectively) for GCRPS compared to TPRPS. The greenhouse experiment validated the results obtained in the field by simplifying the non-physiological water consumption processes, and thus confirming the relative importance of physiological processes and increased WUE under GCRPS. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?