Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this review was to systematically appraise survival rates of implants placed using the osteotome technique with and without grafting in the published literature. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective studies on osteotome sinus floor elevation published between January 1, 2000 and October 30, 2015. Studies were included that (1) involved use of the osteotome technique with or without grafting; (2) provided data regarding the implant survival rates, residual bone height (RBH), and grafting materials; and (3) reported mean follow-up of at least 1 year after functional loading and included a minimum of 10 patients. The mean weighted cumulative implant survival rates were used to compare the two treatment strategies-grafted or nongrafted. The influence of RBH and implant length on weighted cumulative implant survival was also evaluated. Results: After search and evaluation of the literature according to the inclusion criteria, 34 studies involving 1,977 patients and 3,119 implants were included. Eighty-four out of 102 implant failures documented in the studies occurred within 1 year of functional loading. Statistically significant differences in the cumulative survival rates were found in the graft and nongraft groups (95.89% and 97.30%, respectively; P=.05). In the nongraft group, no statistically significant difference in the cumulative survival rate was found when implants were placed at RBH < 5 mm or >= 5 mm (95.04% and 97.63%, respectively; P=.12). In the graft group, however, a statistically significant difference was found when implants were placed at RBH < 5 mm or >= 5 mm (92.19% and 97.59%, respectively; P<.01). Significantly lower weighted mean cumulative implant survival rates were found in the shorter (< 8 mm) implant group than in the longer (>= 8 mm) implant group (83.33% and 96.28%, respectively; P<.01). Conclusion: The cumulative survival rates were significantly higher in the nongraft group than in the graft group. Early failures (< 1 year functional loading) accounted for the vast majority of the implant failures. The cumulative survival rates in the graft group were significantly lower when the RBH was < 5 mm, while the cumulative survival rates in the nongraft group demonstrated no statistically significant difference based on RBH. Shorter (< 8 mm) implants demonstrated significantly lower cumulative survival rates than longer implants.

Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) Versus Longer Implants (>8 mm) with Sinus Lifting in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Short (≤6 mm) compared with ≥10‐mm dental implants in different clinical scenarios: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta‐analysis, trial sequential analysis and quality of evidence grading

Are short implants (≤8.5 mm) reliable in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Evaluation of Short 6-Mm Implants Alone, Short 8-Mm Implants Combined with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Standard 10-Mm Implants Combined with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxillae: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Outcomes That May Affect Implant and Prosthesis Survival and Complications in Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Randomized controlled multi‐centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10‐year data

Short versus Longer Implants in Sites without the Need for Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Short Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation for Moderately Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.

Treatment Strategies in Moderate Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: Short Dental Implants or Sinus Floor Elevation?

Short (6 mm) and Regular Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla–7-Years Follow-up Study

Clinical Investigation and Patient Satisfaction of Short Implants Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Predictability of short implants ( < 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review

Survival Of Implants Using The Osteotome Technique With Or Without Grafting In The Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review

Clinical, Radiographic And Economic Evaluation Of Short-6-Mm Implants And Longer Implants Combined With Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation In Moderately Atrophic Maxillae: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Outcome Difference between Short and Longer Dental Implants Placed Simultaneously with Alveolar Bone Augmentation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Survival Analysis of Implants Placed Simultaneously with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A 3- to 12-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Outcomes of 6.5-Mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.

Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.