Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery (notes) Techniques for Full Thickness R0 Endoscopic Resection of Deep Seated Subepithelial Tumors (sets): First Us Cases
Stavros Stavropoulos,Rani Modayil,Pinghong Zhou,Kumkum Patel,Inna Gulkar,Thomas Coppola,Maurico Zapiach,Collin Brathwaite,David Friedel,James Grendell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201310001-02043
2013-01-01
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Abstract:Purpose: Most UGI SETs are GISTs, potentially malignant tumors. Many guidelines recommend surgery for suspected GISTs ≥2 cm and endoscopic surveillance of those <2 cm. This approach creates a large burden of surgery and endoscopy for small SETs the majority of which are low risk. This situation motivated endoscopists, mostly from Asia, to use ESD to “enucleate” muscularis propria (MP) based SETs. However, such enucleation may leave microscopic residual tumor within the MP. Recently, pioneering Asian centers reported two endoscopic techniques that achieve R0 en bloc resection of MP-based SETs: Submucosal Tunnel Endoscopic Resection (STER)--an offshoot of POEM utilizing the submucosal tunnel method to ensure secure closure of the full-thickness defect in the wall of the GI tract--and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR)-direct full thickness resection with closure of the defect with clips or sutures. We report possibly the first series of EFTR and STER in the U.S. Methods: Procedures were performed from 4/2012-5/2013. Lesion location/size, knives, anesthesia, ASA class, length of procedure, closure technique, histologic diagnosis, adverse events (AEs), and length of stay (LOS) were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Results: Fourteen resections (12 EFTRs, 2 STERs) were performed (all procedures but one by one operator, SNS, a gastroenterologist with extensive POEM and ESD experience; one procedure was performed by PZ as part of a live course at our institution). Mean age 61 years (44-83). ASA Class I 14%, II 64%, III 22%. Anesthesia: General 4/14, propofol 10/14. Specialized ESD knives used in all cases (IT2, Hybrid, Hook). SET location: 1 esophagus, 1 GE junction, 10 stomach, 1 sigmoid colon, 1 rectum. 8 GISTs, 4 leiomyomas, 1 schwannoma, 1 leiomyosarcoma. Mean size 25 mm (12-55). Mean resection time 72 minutes (21-170). Closure: endoclips 7/14, endoscopic suturing 4/14, both 3/14. All patients were admitted mainly for observation. Mean LOS 1.8 days (1-3). Complete en bloc resection was achieved in all cases. One minor AE (venting of capnoperitoneum). Conclusion: Unlike traditional ESD, EFTR and STER achieve en bloc R0 resection of moderately sized MP-based SETs. We present the first series of such cases in the U.S. The excellent outcomes probably reflect our extensive experience with POEM, advanced closure techniques, and ESD for SETs. EFTR and STER represent a NOTES alternative to laparoscopic wedge resection. Advantages include: 1. Incisionless approach, 2. “Wedge” resection of SETs at locations where laparoscopic “wedge” resection is challenging or impossible such as the GE junction, esophagus and gastric cardia, and 3. Definitive diagnosis and complete resection obviating any further endoscopic surveillance for low risk lesions. Disclosure - Stavros Stavropoulos ERBE honorarium and Boston Scientific honorarium