Current Status and Feasibility of Endoscopic Full‐thickness Resection in Japan: Results of a Questionnaire Survey
Yorimasa Yamamoto,Noriya Uedo,Nobutsugu Abe,Hideki Mori,Haruo Ikeda,Hiromitsu Kanzaki,Kingo Hirasawa,Naohiro Yoshida,Osamu Goto,Shuko Morita,Ping‐Hong Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13045
2018-01-01
Digestive Endoscopy
Abstract:Digestive EndoscopyVolume 30, Issue S1 p. 2-6 EditorialFree Access Current status and feasibility of endoscopic full-thickness resection in Japan: Results of a questionnaire survey Yorimasa Yamamoto, Yorimasa Yamamoto Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorNoriya Uedo, Noriya Uedo Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorNobutsugu Abe, Nobutsugu Abe Department of Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorHirohito Mori, Hirohito Mori Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorHaruo Ikeda, Haruo Ikeda Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorHiromitsu Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Kanzaki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorKingo Hirasawa, Kingo Hirasawa Endoscopy Department, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorNaohiro Yoshida, Naohiro Yoshida Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorOsamu Goto, Osamu Goto Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorShuko Morita, Shuko Morita Department of Gastroenterology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorPinghong Zhou, Pinghong Zhou Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author Yorimasa Yamamoto, Yorimasa Yamamoto Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorNoriya Uedo, Noriya Uedo Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorNobutsugu Abe, Nobutsugu Abe Department of Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorHirohito Mori, Hirohito Mori Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorHaruo Ikeda, Haruo Ikeda Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorHiromitsu Kanzaki, Hiromitsu Kanzaki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorKingo Hirasawa, Kingo Hirasawa Endoscopy Department, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorNaohiro Yoshida, Naohiro Yoshida Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorOsamu Goto, Osamu Goto Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorShuko Morita, Shuko Morita Department of Gastroenterology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, JapanSearch for more papers by this authorPinghong Zhou, Pinghong Zhou Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 16 April 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13045Citations: 10AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Introduction Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely carried out for the treatment of gastrointestinal tract cancers as a minimally invasive treatment. The technique removes the mucosa and the submucosa including the superficial neoplasm. ESD was first applied to early gastric cancer in Japan and now it is carried out worldwide for superficial epithelial neoplasm in the digestive tract. Recently, the technique of ESD has been expanded to new techniques that remove the gastrointestinal wall such as laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery (LECS) which uses a peroral flexible endoscope to cut the gastrointestinal wall and laparoscopy to close the defect,1 and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) which uses peroral flexible endoscopy only to cut and close the gastrointestinal wall.2 These minimally invasive techniques are mainly applied to treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (SMT). In Japan, treatment outcomes for gastric SMT are reported in procedures using laparoscopes such as LECS,1 non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS),3 and combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET).4 Along with this, LECS-related procedures for gastric SMT have been covered by health insurance in Japan since 2014. EFTR was first reported in a porcine model in Japan more than 10 years ago,5 but it has seldom been applied in clinical practice in Japan. In contrast, EFTR for gastric SMT is mainly done in clinical practice in China,2 and treatment outcomes in many cases have been reported. LECS-related procedures are safe and reliable, but it may be too invasive for small gastric SMT. For such lesions, EFTR would be useful as a minimally invasive treatment. However, EFTR still has standardization problems worldwide. In order to clarify the concerns to implement EFTR into Japanese clinical practice, we conducted a questionnaire survey on EFTR for gastric SMT. We herein report the summary of the results and suggest how to improve the procedure to solve the problems. Methods A questionnaire was sent to a panel of endoscopists in leading facilities of therapeutic endoscopy (10 facilities in Japan and one facility in China) who were invited to the upper gastrointestinal session at the Endoscopic Forum Japan (EFJ) 2017. The questionnaires asked about problems in implementing EFTR in clinical practice with open-ended questions rather than closed-ended questions because most Japanese endoscopists still have little experience in carrying out EFTR (Table 1). Based on the results of the questionnaire we examined the current situation and problems of EFTR. Table 1. List of questions in this survey Number Question 1 Please indicate the estimated number of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS)-related surgery (LECS, NEWS, CLEAN-NET etc.) cases carried out at your facility. 2 Please indicate the estimated total number of EFTR (by peroral endoscopy only) cases carried out at your facility. 3 What are the potential indications for EFTR? 4 What are the difficulties in carrying out EFTR in clinical practice at present? 5 What are solutions to implement EFTR in clinical practice? 6 What will be future indications for EFTR when it becomes feasible in clinical practice? CLEAN-NET, combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique; EFTR, endoscopic full-thickness resection; NEWS, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery. Results Questions 1 and 2: Experience of LECS and EFTR First, we surveyed the experience of LECS and EFTR procedures in questions 1 and 2, respectively (Fig. 1). Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Experience of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) (Question 1) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) (Question 2). , submucosal tumor (SMT); , cancer. LECS-related procedures had been carried out for gastric SMT in more than 10 cases at each facility. However, LECS-related procedures for early gastric cancer had been done at only five Japanese facilities and the NEWS or CLEAN-NET methods are used. EFTR for gastric SMT had been carried out at only two of the 10 Japanese facilities. In contrast, the one Chinese facility had carried out more than 800 EFTR for patients with gastric SMT. Only one case with local recurrence after ESD underwent EFTR for gastric cancer. Question 3: Potential diseases to be treated by EFTR Regarding the potential diseases (indication) to be treated by EFTR, almost all endoscopists agreed on the indication for EFTR for gastric SMT and gastric cancer with the following features (Table 2). Gastric SMT: lesions 3 cm or smaller in size without ulceration. Gastric cancer: patients who refuse gastric resection, patients in whom ESD is technically difficult as a result of fibrosis, and elderly or poor-surgical-risk patients with localized invasive lesions beyond ESD indication are proposed to be eligible for EFTR. Table 2. Possible indication for EFTR (Question 3) Disease Indication Submucosal tumor (GIST) ≤3 cm No ulceration Retrievable from the mouth Gastric cancer Refusal of gastric resection Technical difficulty of ESD (anastomosis, severe fibrosis etc.) Positive resection margin after ESD Elderly or poor surgical risk patients beyond indication ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Question 4: Difficulties in carrying out EFTR at present Difficulties in the EFTR procedure that were noted by endoscopists were mainly classified into two technical aspects (i.e. excision of the lesion and closure of the defect). (Table 3). Table 3. Difficulty in carrying out endoscopic full-thickness resection (Question 4) Procedure Excision Seromuscular incision in the collapsed stomach after full-thickness resection Maintenance of endoscopic view and traction in the collapsed stomach Reliable hemostatic method for bleeding from serosal vessels Protection of adjacent organ injury in the abdominal cavity Closure Difficulty of complete suturing in the collapsed stomach Unavailability of surgical stapler-like devices Others Prevention of tumor dissemination and infection Not covered by public health insurance Technical difficulties for lesion excision were: (i) maintenance of endoscopic view and achievement of adequate traction after luminal collapses by full-thickness incision; (ii) management of bleeding from thick subserosal vessels; and (iii) protection from injury to adjacent organs etc. Technical difficulties for closure of the luminal defect were: (i) secure and reliable closure for a collapsed gastric wall; and (ii) unavailability of surgical instruments such as a surgical stapler etc. Other difficulties included prevention of peritoneal infection and tumor dissemination during full-thickness resection, and coverage by public insurance etc. Question 5: Solutions that are required to carry out EFTR Solutions to improve the EFTR procedure and implement it in clinical practice were proposed in terms of development of technique and devices. The following solutions for the procedure and devices that need to be developed were proposed (Table 4). Table 4. Solutions to implement EFTR in clinical practice (Question 5) Technical development Quick, reliable, and complete suturing method Application of traction from tumor side Exploration of pure EFTR methods without opening gastric wall Development of method to prevent damage of adjacent organs in the abdominal cavity Device development Clip applicator that can grasp tissue widely and repeat quickly Suturing device for EFTR without opening gastric wall More large twin graspers that rotate freely Large OTSC clip Preoperative diagnostic imaging technology for blood vessels outside the gastric wall Instruments that keep clean the tool that passes the esophagus and stomach and used in the abdominal cavity EFTR, endoscopic full-thickness resection; OTSC, over-the-scope clip. In the technical development: (i) reliable full-layer suturing method; (ii) method to achieve adequate traction for lesion removal and luminal wall tension for suturing; and (iii) full-thickness suturing methods before resection are expected. Regarding device development: (i) clipping devices that can reliably grasp and close the tissue and gastric wall; (ii) a large grasping device that can be used during application of suturing or clipping was proposed. The endoscopists also suggested usefulness of imaging technology that can identify subserosal vessels during the procedure, and a device or a method to keep the abdominal cavity clean during the procedure. Question 6: Future indications for EFTR If the EFTR procedure is to be implemented in clinical practice, the endoscopists believed that the following diseases may be able to be treated with EFTR: gastric cancer that is difficult to remove by ESD technique, gastrojejunal bypass surgery, obesity surgery for reflux esophagitis, early cancer in the diverticulum etc. (Table 5). Table 5. Future indications for EFTR when it becomes feasible in clinical practice Closing of perforation site during ESD Early gastric cancer which is difficult to remove with ESD EFTR for other organ's lesion Stomach-jejunal bypass surgery Sleeve gastrectomy (bariatric surgery) Gastrointestinal stenosis surgery Reflux esophagitis surgery Suturing of artificial ulcer after ESD Early cancer in the diverticulum Resection of esophageal diverticulum etc. EFTR, endoscopic full-thickness resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection. Discussion Endoscopic full-thickness resection was first reported by Ikeda et al. in 2005 in Japan.5 Thereafter, some experimental studies were reported, but EFTR has not been reported in clinical practice in Japan. In China, Zhou et al. reported clinical application of EFTR for gastric SMT in 2011.2 After that, several reports from multiple Chinese facilities showed a high success rate of the EFTR procedure with a few complication cases that required surgical intervention. This questionnaire survey showed that, currently, in Japan, surgical resection and LECS-related procedures are mostly carried out in patients with gastric SMT. Moreover, LECS-related procedures were even applied for early gastric cancer cases in some Japanese institutions. Meanwhile, EFTR is carried out as almost standard treatment for patients with gastric SMT in the Chinese institution. Reasons for the different prevalence and indication for EFTR between Japan and China may be attributed to the different cultural, social, and ethical backgrounds. In many Chinese institutions, most ESD procedures are carried out under general anesthesia and the clip device (Hemoclips, ROCC-D-26-195-C, Microtech, Nanjin, PRC) that is made in China may be more suitable for closing the defect of the gastric wall. Accordingly, we have to determine suitable indications and settings of EFTR for upper gastrointestinal lesions in Japan. In the questionnaire survey, it was agreed that gastric SMT 3 cm or less in size without ulceration are eligible for EFTR. Recently, with the development of the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) technique, even small (<2 cm) SMT enable diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).6 At present, LECS-related procedures are standard therapy for patients with small GIST in Japan. In the LECS procedure, tumor resection is carried out from luminal side with peroral flexible endoscopy but it requires an extraluminal maneuver to close the resected luminal defect. Such a maneuver seems to be too invasive for small GIST, especially when the lesion is located in the lesser curvature of the upper body or near the cardia because the lesser omentum that contains gastric arteries and veins and the vagal nerve should be dissected. The EFTR technique for such small GIST is beneficial and is expected to be established as a standard treatment in the future. Among gastric cancers, it was agreed that patients who refuse gastric resection, patients in whom ESD is technically difficult as a result of fibrosis, and elderly or poor-surgical-risk patients with localized invasive lesions beyond ESD indication may be eligible for EFTR. EFTR for such gastric cancers can remove the lesions only without lymph node dissection. However, if EFTR is carried out in conjunction with sentinel node basin dissection, indication for the procedure for gastric cancers may be expanded in the future.7 One of the difficulties of the current EFTR procedure is derived from luminal collapse after full-thickness incision, and how to secure the closure of the luminal defect is a key to improve the EFTR procedure. It is essential to develop devices that solve such difficulties of EFTR in the future. Mori et al. have developed a mechanical traction device to prevent gastric luminal collapse after full-thickness incision,8 and the Double-arm-bar Suturing System as a full-thickness suturing instrument.10 Takizawa et al. have developed a new EFTR technique in the porcine stomach in which the procedure is mainly carried out in the submucosa.10 As the procedures do not open the stomach wall, it is advantageous for avoidance of both bleeding from subserosal vessels and damage to adjacent organs. Although further development of devices is necessary, many clinical studies of EFTR that use currently available ESD devices have already been reported from China. Accordingly, even in Japan, if we set reasonable indications and carefully select patients that fulfil the indication criteria, we must be able to implement EFTR in Japanese clinical practice. If new devices that can solve the problems of the current EFTR procedure are developed in the future, EFTR will also be indicated for other diseases. In the meantime, EFTR could be carried out for small GIST as an investigated trial under general anesthesia with back-up laparoscopy on standby. In summary, this questionnaire survey showed the current situation and problems surrounding the EFTR procedure in Japan in comparison with the Chinese practice. Preparation of optimal setting in collaboration with laparoscopic surgeons and development of new devices are needed to implement EFTR in Japanese clinical practice. Conflicts of Interest Authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article. References 1Hiki N, Yamamoto Y, Fukunaga T et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection. Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 1729– 35. 2Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 2926– 31. 3Goto O, Mitsui T, Fujishiro M et al. New method of endoscopic full-thickness resection: a pilot study of non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery in an ex vivo porcine model. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 183– 7. 4Inoue H, Ikeda H, Hosoya T et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and beyond: full-layer resection for gastric cancer with nonexposure technique (CLEAN-NET). Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2012; 21: 129– 40. 5Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mills T, Tajiri H, Swain CP. Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 62: 122– 9. 6Sekine M, Imaoka H, Mizuno N et al. Clinical course of gastrointestinal stromal tumor diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Dig. Endosc. 2015; 27: 44– 52. 7Goto O, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H et al. Feasibility of non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery with sentinel node basin dissection as a new surgical method for early gastric cancer: a porcine survival study. Gastric Cancer 2015; 18: 440– 5. 8Mori H, Rafiq K, Kobara H et al. Innovative noninsufflation EFTR: sufficient endoscopic operative field by mechanical counter traction device. Surg. Endosc. 2013; 27: 3028– 34. 9Mori H, Kobara H, Fujihara S et al. Feasibility of pure EFTR using an innovative new endoscopic suturing device: the Double-arm-bar Suturing System (with video). Surg. Endosc. 2014; 28: 683– 90. 10Takizawa K, Knipschield MA, Gostout CJ. Submucosal endoscopy as an aid to full-thickness resection: pilot study in the porcine stomach. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015; 81: 450– 4. Citing Literature Volume30, IssueS1Special Issue: Proceedings of the Endoscopy Forum Japan (EFJ), 5-6 August 2017, Grand Park Otaru, Hokkaido, Japan. Guest Editors: Yoshinori Igarashi, Masayuki Kitano and Yutaka Saito. This supplement was published with the support of OLYMPUS CORPORATIONApril 2018Pages 2-6 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation