Effect of Different Methods of Postoperative Pain Management on Plasma Endothelin and Atrial Natriuretic Polypeptide in Patients with Hypertension Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery

刘晓荣,王焱林,王成夭,张宗泽,唐宏刚
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-1416.2003.03.002
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of different methods of postoperative pain management on plasma endothelin(ET) and atrial natriuretic polypeptide( ANP) in patients with hypertension after upper abdominal surgery.Methods Thirty patients with hypertension (19 male, 11 female) aged 48-75 years, weighing 49-73 kg undergoing upper abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of hypertension was based on the criteria established by WHO/ISH (systolic≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic ≥ 90 mm Hg) .The patients were randomly divided into three groups of 10 patients each according to the methods of postoperative pain management: control group(A); PCEAgroup(B) and PCIA group(C). In group A patients received a bolus of pethidine 50 mg im when patients complained that pain was intolerable. In group B an epidural catheter was placed at T8-9 before induction of general anesthesia. After operation patients received a loading dose of morphine 2 mg, droperidol 2.5 mg and 0.375% bupivacaine 6 ml through the epidural catheter, followed by patient-controlled epidural analgesia(PCEA) with a mixture of fentanyl 400 μg + droperidol 2.5 mg + bupivacaine 150 mg in 100 ml (background infusion 2 ml ·h-1,bolus dose 1 ml, lock-out interval 5 min ). In group C patients received a loading dose of morphine 2 mg and droperidol 2.5 mg followed by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with a mixture of morphine 10 mg + fentanyl 500 μg + droperidol 2.5 mg in 100 ml ( background infusion 2 ml·h-1, bolus dose 1 ml, lock-out interval 5 min). PCEA and PCIA lasted for 48 h. Operation was performed under general anesthesia induced with midazolam 5 mg, fentanyl 3 μg·kg-1 ,propofol 1.5 mg·kg-1 and vecuronium 0.15 μg· kg-1 and maintained with isoflurane inhalation and vecuronium infusion(0.3 mg· kg-1· h-1 ) .Venous blood samples were obtained before operation(T1 ) ,at the end of operation(T2) ,24 h(T3) and 48 h after operation(T4) for determination of plasma ET and ANP. Pain was assessed using visual analog scale(VAS) .Results Plasma ET and ANP in group B and C were significantly lower than those in group A 24 h after operation( P 0.05 for group C; P 0.01 for group B) . Forty-eight hours after operation (T4 ) plasma ET and ANP were still significantly lower in group B than those in group A ( P 0.05) ,but there was no significant difference in plasma ET and ANP between group A and C( P 0.05). BP, HR and VAS scores were higher in group A than those in group B and C after operation. Conclusions In patients with hypertension both PCEA and PCIA can effectively relieve pain after upper abdominal operation and suppress the increase in plasma ET and ANP level after operation. PCEA is more effective than PCIA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?