The Belief Assumption of Knowledge

Duo-yi FEI
2015-01-01
Abstract:Traditionally justification has been at the core of the theory of knowledge. However,the regression-based beliefs seem to exclude the possibility that we have any knowledge. Resorting to the causal relationship between knowledge and fact instead of justification can successfully avoid the retrogression problem as well as Gettier 's counter-examples,but it will leave us in an irrational state. The dilemma lies in the assumptionthat the belief of the knower can only be determined by the beliefs he holds. In fact,the so-called basic belief is not based on self-justification,but defended by other non-belief intrinsic state. We can provide such a defense because the internal state of non-belief isdirectly accessibleto us. Despite this,it is the cognitive subject who makes knowledge become something meaningful,as a result,what we know cannot get rid of our belief yet.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?