Methods Models for Belief and Knowledge

Jonathan Shaheen,Davide Fassio,Fabrice Correia,Olivier Roy,Andreas Witzel,Vincent Hendricks,Johan van Benthem
2010-01-01
Abstract:We introduce a formal representation of belief and knowledge based on the idea that knowledge is a matter of forming a belief through a su ciently error-free method. We rst model methods and their infallibility, then de ne belief and knowledge in terms of them. The resulting models are a signi cant extension of so-called neighbourhood models . We argue that epistemological notions and problems like Gettier, inductive knowledge, fallible justi cation, epistemic contextualism, or failure of logical omniscience are represented in a more satisfactory ways in these models than in standard epistemic logic. In general, our models only validate the claim that knowledge is true belief; but we show that a full S5 system can be derived from a set of natural idealisations. The derivation provides some explanation of why and when the S5 axioms should hold, and a vindication of their use. ∗Thanks to Paul Egré, Elia Zardini, Jonathan Shaheen, Davide Fassio, Fabrice Correia, Olivier Roy, Andreas Witzel, Vincent Hendricks, Johan van Benthem, John Hawthorne, Jonas de Vuyst, Timothy Williamson for much-needed help and encouragement, and to audiences in Geneva (Palmyr workshop), Lausanne (DLG09), Nancy (EpiConfFor workshop) and two anonymous referees for useful comments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?