Abstract:With the introduction of an increasing number of evaluation indexes, researchers have begun to pay attention to the limitations of such indexes in research evaluation, understanding which to avoid misusing and making evaluation more scientific and reasonable. Analysing the principles of the h-index, g-index, AR-index, p-index, integrated impact indicator (I3), and academic trace, this paper explores their limitations in measuring the research performance of authors from the perspectives of consistency, the degree of discrimination, and the statistical relationship between the values of indicators and the number of publications and citations. There are some interesting findings. These six indicators are highly consistent, and they are all more susceptible to the number of publications than to the frequency of citations. Among them, the h-index has the lowest degree of discrimination, followed by the g-index, I3, AR-index, p-index, and academic trace. The g-index ignores papers and citations other than the g-core. Moreover, compared to the h-index, the accumulation of citations makes it easier for the g-index to be equal to the number of papers published by an author, and once its value equals the number of papers, subsequent citations received by these papers will no longer contribute to the growth of the g-index unless the author publishes a new paper. Additionally, the AR-index ignores the h-tail papers and citations, which underestimates the impact of many researchers. Moreover, the p-index is insensitive to highly cited papers. Furthermore, the I3 is very vulnerable to the influence of the extremums in a data set. Finally, we propose considerations and suggestions for the research performance evaluation of authors.

Analysis of the H index of readers' reading tendency based on the optimization of library collection

Research on Multi-level Extension Optimal Decision Analysis of Network Digital Library Resources

The Statistical Analysis on the Professional Books Lending in the Library of Conservatory of Music

Comparative Study on H-index Correlative Factors of Journal Papers Published by University Library

Development and optimization of the library anxiety scale for international students in China

Statistical Model of Scientific Research Evaluation

Library Personalized Information Recommendation System Based on Dynamic and Static Interest Model

A CSSCI-based Positive Study on the H-index of Scholars in Humanities and Social Sciences

Exploring the limitations of the h-index and h-type indexes in measuring the research performance of authors

Questionnaire Survey and Study of Readers' Current Reading Situations in Nanjing

An Empirical Study of H-index and G-index Based on CSSCI

Empirical Research on Schubert's H-Index of a Single Paper——Taking the Library and Information Science as Examples

The Empirical Study and Countermeasures Based on the New Book Usage——to Take an Example of the Minhang New Book Stacks in ECNU

The Social Attention and Trend of the “Library” in Our Country from the Perspective of Internet Searching -- Taking Baidu Index as an Example

Empirical Analysis and Structure Optimization of Electronic Resouces Utilization

User Behavior Analysis in the Library-based on Data Mining

Analysis on Immediacy Index of Library,Information and Documentation Science Academic Journals——Based on CSSCI(2004-2008)

A Preliminary Study of the Relationship Between the H-Index and Excess Citations / Étude Préliminaire De La Relation Entre L’indice De Hirsch (Indice-H) Et Les Citations Excédentaires

A Positive Study on the H-index of International Core Journals in Natural Sciences

Research on Reading Habits of College Students Based on Fuzzy Set Theory and Intelligent Transformation of Libraries

Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index