Clinical effects of entecavir alone vs lamivudine and Adefovir Combination on HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis: one year baseline data characteristics of a prospective, multicenter and non-intervention study

吴晓宁,陈国凤,谢雯,丁惠国,欧晓娟,徐小元,马慧,马安林,徐有青
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2014.06.006
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To summarize one year baseline characteristics data of a clinical study aiming to investigate effects of two early anti- viral therapies entecavir alone vs Lamivudine and adefovir combination on HBV related compensated liver cirrhosis. Methods Patients ages from 18 to 70 years old who clinically diagnosed as HBV- induced compensated cirrhosis of chronic HBV- induced cirrhosis were eligible for recruitment if they are HBeAg- positive with HBVDNA 103IU / ml or HBeAg- negative with HBVDNA 102IU / ml. Patents received either entecavir alone or Lamivudine and adefovir combination according to the willness of patients. Data are collected at baseline,and every three months for blood count,liver function test,renal function test and HBVDNA,every six months for AFP,prothrombin time,liver ultrasonography,and Fibroscan. Results Two hundred and fourty of 382 included patients are analysed to August 2013. Two hundred patients are treated with entecavir, fourty patients are treated with Lamivudine and adefovir. Two groups are comparable in age,sex,HBeAg and HBV DNA level. One hundred and seventy six patients are male( 73. 3%),average age are( 44. 6 ± 11. 6) years old,of 58% patients are HBeAg positive,HBV DNA median is 5. 94( 4. 33,6. 87) log10 IU/ml. The baseline characteristics data are similar to 4006 study in which patients were histologically confirmed of chronic HBV- induced cirrhosis. Conclusion The baseline data characteristics are similar to patients histologically confirmed of chronic HBV- induced cirrhosis. There is an obvious divergence of therapy option in entecavir alone or Lamivudine and adefovir combination.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?