A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled, multicenter study of entecavir maleate versus entecavir for treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: results at week 48

Jing-hang XU,Yan-yan YU,Chong-wen SI,Zheng ZENG,Jun LI,Qing MAO,Da-zhi ZHANG,Hong TANG,Ji-fang SHENG,Xin-yue CHEN,Qin NING,Guang-feng SHI,Qing XIE,Xi-quan ZHANG,Jun DAI,Zhong-nan XU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2012.07.007
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) maleate versus ETV in Chinese patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB).Methods This was a randomized,double-blind,double-dummy,controlled,multicenter study.Patients were randomly assigned to receive 48 weeks of treatment with 0.5 mg/day ETV (group A;n=26) or0.5 mg/day ETV maleate (n=31).Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured at weeks 12,24,and 48 by the Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Taqman PCR assay.Adverse events (AE) were recorded.Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups.At weeks 12,24,and 48,the mean HBV DNA level had similarly decreased from baseline in both groups (A:by 4.24,4.61 and 4.88 log10 IU/mL vs.B:4.01,4.50 and 4.99 log10 IU/mL,respectively; all P>0.05).Patients who achieved undetectable levels of serum HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) at week 48 were similar in the two groups (A:69.23% vs.B:80.65%; P>0.05).Both groups achieved similar normalization of ALT at week 48 (A:96.00% vs.B:83.87%;P>0.05).The overall AE incidence was similar for the two groups (A:22.22% vs.B:9.38%; P>0.05).Conclusion Entecavir maleate and entecavir showed similar efficacy and safety in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?