A New Method of Priority Vector in Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Eddie W.L. Cheng,Heng Li,Danny C.K. Ho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-9128.2001.04.001

2001-01-01

Abstract:According to statistics and fuzzy analysis, experts of construct judgement matrix are classified and weighted. Meanwhile, a new method of priority vector in AHP is proposed. The application of the method is illustrated with an example.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

Yucheng Dong,Weijun Xu,Weidong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2013.055018

2013-01-01

European Journal of Industrial Engineering

Abstract:In the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Saaty's consistency index is performed to ensure that the preference information, provided in an individual judgement matrix, is neither random nor illogical. Based on the extension of Saaty's consistency index, this paper proposes a consensus index to measure the difference between the individual preference values and the collective preference value in AHP group decision making. Furthermore, based on the consensus index, we propose a consensus prioritisation method to obtain the collective priority vector for AHP group decision making, and develop a non-linear programme model to automatically reach acceptable consensus in a local context (a unique criterion). The consensus model in this paper can optimally preserve original preference information in reaching acceptable consensus (in some sense). A genetic algorithm also is designed to solve this non-linear programme model.
A nonlinear program model to obtain consensus priority vector in the analytic hierarchy process

Weijun Xu,Yucheng Dong,Weilin Xiao,Jinhong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2008.4630884

2008-01-01

Abstract:In group decision making, because the decision-makers usually represent different interest backgrounds, it is worth to study how to make the different decision makers coordinate and cooperate for aggregating group opinions. In this paper, based on the analytic hierarchy process, we propose a nonlinear program model to obtain consensus priority vector, and point that the model can make decision-makers reach consensus by improving compatibility of judgement matrices. Moreover, we use the genetic-simulated annealing algorithm to obtain its optimal solution. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the application of this method.
A Tfn-Based Ahp Method For Solving Multi-Alternative Decision-Making Problems

Jian Cao,Chunjie Yang,Gengui Zhou,Feng Tang,Ping Li

2007-01-01

Abstract:In practical multi-alternative decision-making problems, the decision-makers usually assign the evaluation values with uncertainty degrees rather than precise ratings. Dealing with the inconsistency of the judgment matrix constructed by pairwise comparison is also a problem. By employing the properties of triangular fuzzy number (TFN) and logarithmic least-squares method (LLSM) to treat a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) problem, this paper presents a new TFN-based AHP method. In contrast to the existing fuzzy AHP methods, the method developed herein can effectively handle disagreements between different rankings and elicit priorities from the alternative set without taking the inconsistency of corresponding judgment matrix into consideration. The effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method in deriving the most promising alternative within a group decision-making environment is demonstrated by an illustrative example.
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Extensions

Alessio Ishizaka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_2

2019-01-01

Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Abstract:Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a popular and long used multi-criteria decision analysis method. Despite this fact, there are still space for new research in all its methodological steps. These include problem structuring, pairwise comparisons, priorities derivation, consistency and reduction techniques of pairwise comparisons. Moreover, future research agenda can also be found in the extensions of AHP: Analytic Network Process (for dealing with interactions) and AHPSort (for sorting problems). Finally, we discuss visualisation techniques for the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Efficient vectors in priority setting methodology

Susana Furtado,Charles Johnson

2024-04-22

Abstract:The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a much discussed method in ranking business alternatives based on empirical and judgemental information. We focus here upon the key component of deducing efficient vectors for a reciprocal matrix of pair-wise comparisons. It is not yet known how to produce all efficient vectors. It has been shown that the entry-wise geometric mean of all columns is efficient for any reciprocal matrix. Here, by combining some new basic observations with some known theory, we 1) give a method for inductively generating large collections of efficient vectors, and 2) show that the entry-wise geometric mean of any collection of distinct columns of a reciprocal matrix is efficient. We study numerically, using different measures, the performance of these geometric means in approximating the reciprocal matrix by a consistent matrix.

Optimization and Control,Combinatorics
A Group-Evaluation Method Based on AHP and Theory of Triangular Fuzzy Number

Jian Cao,Gengui Zhou,Xiaojuan Wu,Ping Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/wcica.2004.1341947

2004-01-01

Abstract:In view of uncertainty degree of judgment in group-evaluation problem, a new method combined the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the basic theory of triangular fuzzy number was given in this paper. A real case study of personnel selection in Matlab environment demonstrated its application and examined its effectiveness. The use of this proposed method indicates that it is easier for the evaluation team not only to obtain impartial and reasonable resulting value, but also to arrive at a consensus decision. Moreover, the consistent degree of decision or opinion of each decision element from different expert can be showed clearly.
A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment

H. Wang,M. Xie,T. N. Goh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412988361

1998-08-01

Total Quality Management

Abstract:As a tool to identify customer needs and translate customer requirements into technical responses, the house of quality (HOQ) has become one of the most useful techniques in total quality management, especially in the context of quality function deployment (QFD). Recently, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been recommended for prioritizing the customer voice in HOQ. In this paper, we recommend that AHP be applied not only to the customer voice, but also directly to the technical responses. Since the decision-maker can select either the prioritization matrix method or the AHP method for HOQ applications, an understanding of their advantages and disadvantages becomes important. In this paper, we compare these two methods in terms of practical applications in industry leading to the general conclusion that if time, cost and difficulty are the major concerns in product improvement, the prioritization matrix method is preferred; where accuracy is the major requirement, the AHP method would be a better choice.
On the Extent Analysis Method for Fuzzy AHP and Its Applications

Ying-Ming Wang,Ying Luo,Zhongsheng Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050

IF: 6.4

2007-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:In a paper by Chang [D.Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 95 (1996) 649–655], an extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP was proposed to obtain a crisp priority vector from a triangular fuzzy comparison matrix. It is found that the extent analysis method cannot estimate the true weights from a fuzzy comparison matrix and has led to quite a number of misapplications in the literature. In this paper, we show by examples that the priority vectors determined by the extent analysis method do not represent the relative importance of decision criteria or alternatives and that the misapplication of the extent analysis method to fuzzy AHP problems may lead to a wrong decision to be made and some useful decision information such as decision criteria and fuzzy comparison matrices not to be considered. We show these problems to avoid any possible misapplications in the future.
A New AHP Integrated with Orthogonal Design

BAO Yi-dan,WU Yan-ping,HE Yong,GE Xiao-feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2005.01.019

2005-01-01

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice

Abstract:In order to enhance objectivity in the traditional Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), an improved AHP method integrated with orthogonal experimental design is presented here. The new method combined AHP and orthogonal design principles in performance assessment where criteria,their objects in system and values computed by mapping and satisfying functions are seen as the corresponding factors, levels and results in orthogonal experimental design. Then with software SAS, priorities on performance are accordingly to be made out. Application show that the new method can improve the accuracy of AHP in performance assessment.
Improving Analytic Hierarchy Process Expert Allocation Using Optimal Computing Budget Allocation

Chun-Hung Chen,Si Zhang,E. P. Chew,L. Lee,Edward Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2015.2478754

2016-08-01

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems

Abstract:The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to multicriteria decision making problems. The AHP aids decision makers to determine the priorities of multiple criteria, and make reasonable decisions. In the AHP, evaluating candidate alternatives requires multiple experts' evaluations to avoid personal subjectivity. Although having more experts can improve selection quality, inviting more experts also results in higher recruitment cost and longer evaluation time. In this paper, we introduce the idea of optimal computing budget allocation (OCBA) and propose a method, named the AHP_OCBA method, to improve the efficiency of expert allocation. The proposed method optimizes the allocation of experts to maximize the probability of correctly selecting the best alternative in the AHP. This method also can minimize the required number of experts to meet the probability of correct selection. An illustrative example is provided to indicate the implementation of the AHP_OCBA method. We show the improvement of the proposed method compared to proportional and equal allocation rules in the numerical result.

Computer Science,Business
DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

T. Saaty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

2008-03-19

Abstract:Decisions involve many intangibles that need to be traded off. To do that, they have to be measured along side tangibles whose measurements must also be evaluated as to, how well, they serve the objectives of the decision maker. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a theory of measurement through pairwise comparisons and relies on the judgements of experts to derive priority scales. It is these scales that measure intangibles in relative terms. The comparisons are made using a scale of absolute judgements that represents, how much more, one element dominates another with respect to a given attribute. The judgements may be inconsistent, and how to measure inconsistency and improve the judgements, when possible to obtain better consistency is a concern of the AHP. The derived priority scales are synthesised by multiplying them by the priority of their parent nodes and adding for all such nodes. An illustration is included.

Computer Science,Business,Mathematics
The Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

万玉成,盛昭瀚

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2004.12.016

2004-01-01

Abstract:The problem is studied when the pairwise comparisons values are uncertain in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Firstly, the method of constructing judgment matrix is presented when the pairwise comparisons values are denoted by the unascertained three-valued reciprocal scales. Then, by turning the reciprocal judgment matrix into attribute judgment matrix, the method to check the consistency degree of the pairwise comparisons judgment matrix and the calculation method of weighting coefficients are given. Finally, numerical examples are given.
A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements

Yan Liu,Claudia M. Eckert,Christopher Earl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738

IF: 8.5

2020-12-01

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:<p>Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a broadly applied multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the weights of criteria and priorities of alternatives in a structured manner based on pairwise comparison. As subjective judgments during comparison might be imprecise, fuzzy sets have been combined with AHP. This is referred to as fuzzy AHP or FAHP. An increasing amount of papers are published which describe different ways to derive the weights/priorities from a fuzzy comparison matrix, but seldomly set out the relative benefits of each approach so that the choice of the approach seems arbitrary. A review of various fuzzy AHP techniques is required to guide both academic and industrial experts to choose suitable techniques for a specific practical context. This paper reviews the literature published since 2008 where fuzzy AHP is applied to decision-making problems in industry, particularly the various selection problems. The techniques are categorised by the four aspects of developing a fuzzy AHP model: (i) representation of the relative importance for pairwise comparison, (ii) aggregation of fuzzy sets for group decisions and weights/priorities, (iii) defuzzification of a fuzzy set to a crisp value for final comparison, and (iv) consistency measurement of the judgements. These techniques are discussed in terms of their underlying principles, origins, strengths and weakness. Summary tables and specification charts are provided to guide the selection of suitable techniques. Tips for building a fuzzy AHP model are also included and six open questions are posed for future work.</p>

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
A New Method of Solving Multi-objective Integer Programming

CHEN Jing,ZHOU Xiao-yun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16515/j.cnki.32-1722/n.2008.01.002

2008-01-01

Abstract:In the weighting method of solving multi-objective integer programming, interactive method takes the preference of decision-maker into consideration,but needs large complexity.Noninteractive method takes the reverse approach.This paper presents a new weighting method based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP).The corresponding algorithm gets a balance between the preference of decision-maker and computational complexity.The algorithm is improved to deal with data nonbalance.At last,an example shows that the algorithm is efficient.
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with ordered pair of normalized real numbers

Haoyang Cui,Hui Zhang,Lei Zhou,Chunming Yang,Bo Li,Xujian Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08232-7

IF: 3.732

2023-05-12

Soft Computing

Abstract:The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a widely used multi-criteria decision theory, and most AHP relies on the judgments of experts to derive priority scales. However, the judgments of experts may be subjective. Using machine learning algorithms for decision-making can be more objective, but machine learning algorithms are strongly related to the collected data and not being flexible enough. This paper tries to combine experts’ judgments with algorithmic judgments to improve the bias of experts’ judgments while still making decision-making flexible. In this paper, the authors introduce the ordered pair of normalized real numbers (OPNs) into the AHP method for the first time and propose the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with the OPNs (OFAHP). The OFAHP uses OPNs to combine experts’ judgments with those of machine learning algorithms and then make decisions by OPNs. Experiments on real data sets show that the proposed method can get reasonable decision results. Moreover, when the experts’ judgments are wrong or invalid, the judgments given by the machine learning algorithm can correct the experts’ judgments to obtain a reasonable decision-making result.

computer science, artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary applications
Mapping verbal responses to numerical scales in the analytic hierarchy process

Liang Liang,Guohua Wang,Zhongsheng Hua,Bin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2005.10.006

IF: 4.641

2008-01-01

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences

Abstract:Central to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are the pairwise comparisons between decision alternatives that are elicited either verbally or numerically. Since comparisons expressed in numbers are required to compute importance weights in the approach, all verbal judgments must be quantified. We propose new scales, and develop a way to identify which numerical scale is best for a given individual. The approach is based on newly-designed compound operation of decision-makers’ preference judgments. We illustrate this process with two examples.
Study and Applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process

Jin-yu GUO,Zhong-bin ZHANG,Qing-yun SUN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.05.025

2008-01-01

Abstract:AHP (analytic hierarchy process), as a comprehensive safety evaluation method combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, has been used in many fields of safety and environmental science. The applications of AHP, improved AHP, FAHP (fuzzy AHP), improved FAHP and gray AHP in safety and environmental science were analyzed, summarized and prospected. The major factors affecting the work of occupational hazard supervision were analyzed. Considering the advantages that AHP can decompose the complex issues and provide the scientific basis for the choice of optimal decisions, it was proposed to use AHP in the fields of occupational hazard supervision.
Virtual Enterprise Partnership Selection Method Based on AHP Fuzzy Preference

李凌丰,谭建荣,赵海霞

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2004.12.001

2004-01-01

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice

Abstract:Virtual enterprise partnership selection is a complex evaluation process, while the judgment includes inconsistency and interval. In the framework of Analytic hierarchy process, this paper firstly presents the comparison ratios between alternative partners as intervals with lower and upper bounds to capture the uncertainty and inconsistency experienced by the decision-maker. Secondly, the membership function of fuzzy set denotes the degree of satisfaction with a given solution. Then, a fuzzy constraint matrix is constructed. Lastly, the linear program is applied to find the priority vector that has a maximum degree of membership. And the global priorities of all alternative partners are calculated. A numerical example is given to illustrate the application of this method.
The Unascertained Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application in Venture Capital

万玉成,辛后居,盛昭瀚

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4098.2004.07.004

2004-01-01

Abstract:The problem is studied when the pairwise comparisons values are unascertained in AHP. By turning the (unascertained) three-valued reciprocal judgment matrix into attribute judgment matrix, the method to check the consistency degree of the pairwise comparisons judgment matrix and the calculation method of weighting coefficients are given. Finally, its application in venture capital is given.
Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight

Don-Lin Mon,Ching-Hsue Cheng,Jiann-Chern Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90052-3

IF: 4.462

1994-03-01

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Abstract:The performance evaluation of weapon systems are multiple criteria decision making problems. The descriptions and judgements on weapon systems are usually linguistic and fuzzy. The traditional method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are mainly used in crisp (non-fuzzy) decision applications with a very unbalanced scale of judgements. To overcome these problems, we will propose a new and general decision making method for evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy AHP based on entropy weight. We will use symmetric triangular fuzzy number 1 to 9 to indicate the relative strength of the elements in the hierarchy, and build fuzzy judgement vectors (matrix) through comparison of the performance scores. We will derive the priority among the alternatives by the entropy weight through the use of interval arithmetic, α-cuts, and index of optimism (the degree of optimism of the decision maker) to estimate the degree of satisfaction of the judgement. In this way it does not require a series of pairwise comparison judgements as required by the traditional AHP method. By multiplying the fuzzy subjective weight vector W̃ with the corresponding fuzzy judgement matrix X̃ (the orderly list of fuzzy judgement vectors x̃·i for every criterion Ci), a fuzzy problem can be solved and a weapon system selection example will be used to illustrate our method and compare it with other methods.

mathematics, applied,statistics & probability,computer science, theory & methods

A New Method of Priority Vector in Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

A nonlinear program model to obtain consensus priority vector in the analytic hierarchy process

A Tfn-Based Ahp Method For Solving Multi-Alternative Decision-Making Problems

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Extensions

Efficient vectors in priority setting methodology

A Group-Evaluation Method Based on AHP and Theory of Triangular Fuzzy Number

A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment

On the Extent Analysis Method for Fuzzy AHP and Its Applications

A New AHP Integrated with Orthogonal Design

Improving Analytic Hierarchy Process Expert Allocation Using Optimal Computing Budget Allocation

DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

The Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements

A New Method of Solving Multi-objective Integer Programming

Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with ordered pair of normalized real numbers

Mapping verbal responses to numerical scales in the analytic hierarchy process

Study and Applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process

Virtual Enterprise Partnership Selection Method Based on AHP Fuzzy Preference

The Unascertained Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application in Venture Capital

Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight