Dual-energy CT based vascular iodine analysis improves sensitivityfor peripheral pulmonary artery thrombus detection: Anexperimental study in canines
Chun Xiang Tang,Long Jiang Zhang,Zong Hong Han,Chang Sheng Zhou,Aleksander W. Krazinski,Justin R. Silverman,U. Joseph Schoepf,Guangming Lü
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.021
IF: 4.531
2013-01-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) based vascular iodine analysis for thedetection of acute peripheral pulmonary thrombus (PE) in a canine model with histopathological findingsas the reference standard.Materials and methods: The study protocol was approved by our institutional animal committee. Thrombi(n = 12) or saline (n = 4) were intravenously injected via right femoral vein in sixteen dogs, respectively. CTpulmonary angiography (CTPA) in DECT mode was performed and conventional CTPA images and DECTbased vascular iodine studies using Lung Vessels application were reconstructed. Two radiologists visu-ally evaluated the number and location of PEs using conventional CTPA and DECT series on a per-animaland a per-clot basis. Detailed histopathological examination of lung specimens and catheter angiogra-phy served as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), andnegative predictive value (NPV) of DECT and CTPA were calculated on a segmental and subsegmental ormore distal pulmonary artery basis. Weighted values were computed to evaluate inter-modality andinter-reader agreement.Results: Thirteen dogs were enrolled for final image analysis (experimental group = 9, control group = 4).Histopathological results revealed 237 emboli in 45 lung lobes in 9 experimental dogs, 11 emboli insegmental pulmonary arteries, 49 in subsegmental pulmonary arteries, 177 in fifth-order or more distalpulmonary arteries. Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for CTPA plus DECT were93.1%, 76.9%, 87.8%, 89.4%, and 84.2% for the detection of pulmonary emboli. With CTPA versus DECT,sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, PPVs, and NPVs are all 100% for the detection of pulmonary embolion a segmental pulmonary artery basis, 88.9%, 100%, 96.0%, 100%, and 94.1% for CTPA and 90.4%, 93.0%,92.0%, 88.7%, and 94.1% for DECT on a subsegmental pulmonary artery basis; 23.8%, 96.4%, 50.4%, 93.5%,and 36.7% for CTPA and 95.9%, 75.5%, 88.2%, 86.5%, and 91.9% on a sub-subsegmental and more distalpulmonary artery basis, respectively. Good inter-modality ( = 0.65, P < 0.001) and inter-reader (= 0.70,P < 0.001) agreement were observed.Conclusion: With histopathological findings as the reference standard, DECT based vascular iodine analysisimproves the sensitivity for detecting peripheral PE compared with CTPA, albeit at the price of decreasedspecificity and PPV. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.