Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

Chinese Peasants and Political Right

Citizen Social Right in China:Retrospection,Reality and Suggestion for Policy-making

Constitutional Analysis of the Chinese Peasant Problems

On the Real- Rightize of the Contractual Operation Right of Rural Land

Why Peasants are not Satisfied with the Compensation Procedure for Land Acquisition in China?——Typical Survey from Zhejiang Province

A Survey on the Social Security of Peasant-workers

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

Peasants' Psychology And Rural Political Stability In China——A Framework And Its Application

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution

Rural revitalization, scholars, and the dynamics of the collective future in China

On Chinese Farmers' Political Participation in Perspective of Revolution

On the Road to Chinese Characteristic Socialist Rule of Law

Research on Peasantry Participation Model in China’s Rural Planning in the New Era

Participatory Governanle and Realization of the Fundamental Political System in China

Social Differences and Equal Rights in Chinese Mode

A Systemic Interpretation of Social Rights in the Chinese Constitution

Change of Rural Society after Farming Land Reform

Civil Rights in Public Law and the Return of Legal Characteristics of the Constitution

The distance between state and rural society in the PRC. Reading document no 1 (February 2004)

Peasant Resistance beyond the State: Peasant–NGO Interactions in Post Wenchuan Earthquake Reconstruction, China