A study on the sectional and imaging anatomy of the human ankle joints

董炜疆,马兆龙,杨月鲜,杨广夫,刘国强,宫惠琳,冯改丰,张峰昌
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-165X.2004.01.022
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To provide anatomical basis for imaging diagnosis of the human ankle joints diseases. Methods: ① 15 specimans were studied in terms of the observation and measurement of the trochlear surface, medial and lateral malleolus surface of talus, medial and lateral malleolus surface of tibia and fibular. ②7 right feet of male adults cadavers were used. After CT and MRI examination, all specimens were frozen and cut into 4 transverse and 3 coronal sections. Results: ① The anterior and posterior width of upper articular surface of the talus trochlear was 30.2 mm and 23.5 mm respectively. The medial malleolus surface was 30.8 mm in sagittal length and 14.9 mm in vertical length, while the lateral malleolus surface 27.3 mm and 23.7 mm. The distance was found to be 9.3 mm between the anterior border of lateral malleolus surface and posterior border of cervix of talus. The medial articular surface of tibia was 21.8 mm and 14.7 mm in sagittal and vertical length, while the lateral articular surface of fibular was 16.9 mm and 21.6 mm. ②The morphological features were studied concerning the position, relationship and the variation of the articular surface of ankle joint, articular cartilage, articular cavity, tibiofibular syndesmosis, tibiotalar and tibiocalcanes part of medial ligament and posterior talofibular ligament. Matched with the corresponding CT and MRI measurement interosseous talocalcaneal ligament on transverse and coronal section of ankle were observed. The anterior width of upper articular surface of talus trochlear was 32.9 mm. The thickness of articular cartilage of the upper articular surface of talus, and the lower articular surface of tibia was 1.7 mm and 1.8 mm respectively. The length of interosseus tibiofibular ligament was 1.8 mm. The distance of tibiotalus joint cavity, the place of medial malleolus and fibuotalus joint was 2.4 mm, 2.8 mm, 1.4 mm respectively. Conclusion: The sectional anatomy of ankle joint as well as the variation of morphology, structure and measurement data provides a foundation for imaging diagnosis and arthroscopy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?