Radiologic evaluation of ankle from different projective angles

Chao ZHANG,Xu WANG,Xin MA,Jiazhang HUANG,Yijun ZHANG,Chen WANG,Jian XU,Li CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1439.2014.04--15
2014-01-01
Abstract:Background:X-ray is used to confirm intraoperative anatomic reduction of ankle fractures. However, because of individual differences in ankle-related parameters, the rotation angle of foot can not be accurately controlled. It makes radiologic as-sessment difficult, and few studies have been reported. Objective: To measure radiologic parameters of the ankle in different projective angles and to evaluate the reliability of these parameters in the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and deltoid ligament disruption. Methods:Eight fresh lower limb specimens were collected in the study. The models of fibula shortening and deltoid liga-ment injury were constructed. The radiologic parameters, including medial clear space, superior clear space, tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap were measured in the normal specimen and the models of fibula shortening and deltoid ligament injury by"C"arm X-ray machine from-30° to 30° with an interval of 5°. Results:The average medial clear space, superior clear space, tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap were (2.58 ± 0.59) mm, (2.89±0.56) mm, (3.03±0.72) mm, and (4.25±3.14) mm, respectively, in the normal specimens. In shortened fibu-la and (or) deltoid ligament injury models, the medial clear space and tibiofibular clear space increased, while the superior clear space and tibiofibular overlap decreased. The values of all parameters changed with different projective angles of X-ray. Conclusions:There are few changes of tibiofibular clear space from different projective angles. So it is a reliable imaging parameters to judge distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. If medial clear space is bigger than superior clear space, the deltoid liga-ment may be disrupted or the length of fibula may be lost. The negative value of tibiofibular overlap means inferior tibiofib-ular joint injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?