Abstract:What on earth is the means of thinking for human beings Do we have to think with language or may we think without language Though such questions have aroused the interest of linguists, anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers, neuro-scientists and even computer experts, up till now they still cannot offer a satisfactory and unimpeachable answer to these questions. In academic fields, there exist two extreme points of view. One is Identification and the other is Disjunction. The theories of Identification see language and thinking as a single matter while the theories of Disjunction take the two apart. It is claimed by the authors that either of them has its reasonable side but both go to the extremity, and that language and thinking can be combined as well as departed from both perspectives of phylogeny and ontogeny. Thinking is actually the process of concept while words and images are terms to express and expand thinking in working storage. The course of thinking is the course of processing concepts in the brain, during which language is sometimes involved and sometimes not. Although language is one of the major means of thinking for Homo sapiens and although there is an intimate relationship between language and thinking, language is not equal to thinking, which emerges before the acquisition of language, which can also be conducted with means other than language, and which processes information much swifter than the generation of language. Therefore, it is attempted in this paper from the perspective of the relationship between language and thinking to declare that thinking can be categorized into thinking with language which may be subdivided into natural language thinking, special language (sign language and braille) thinking and formula language thinking, and thinking without language which may be subdivided into image thinking and paralinguistic thinking. If we take all these thinking models as signs, then we may conclude that thinking is by means of signs and that thinking is represented by signs in the mind.

Dialectical Thinking of Mathematical Abstraction

Mathematical Character Between the Instrument and Culture: the Exploration of Mathematical Significance from the Concept of Patterned Mathematical Ontology

The Dialectic Nature of the Activities in Science and Technology:the Unity of Reason and Unreason

A Brief Summary of My Researches

Thinking with and Without Language

Abstraction in mathematics: Conflict, resolution and application

Mathematics: abstraction and reality. A sketch toward deeper analysis

Discussion of Melting Mathematical Modeling Thought into Economic Mathematics Teaching

The Nested Epistemic Actions Model for Abstraction in Context: Theory as Methodological Tool and Methodological Tool as Theory

The Mathematical Discipline of Thought in the Light of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology

Research on Abstraction Ability under the Background of Mathematics Key Competencies in Junior High School in China

Implementing Abstraction Ability Literacy in Junior High School Mathematics Classroom Teaching: Strategies to Apply

A memory theoretic approach for investigating the roles of language and intuition in mathematical thinking activities

Students’ reflective abstraction of middle school in reconstructing quadratic equation concept based on high mathematical ability

Mathematics Language and Mathematics Teaching

Hagel's Theory on Relationship Between Formal Logic and Dialectical Logic and Its Contemporary Enlightenment

Algorithm and abstraction in formal mathematics

Research on the Cognition of Pre-service High School Mathematics Teachers for Implementing Mathematical Abstract Literacy

Research on teaching model of secondary school students' abstract ability in mathematics based on NetPad and problem chain

The roots of mathematical thought

Epistemological obstacles in mathematical abstraction on abstract algebra