Comparison of Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation in Postoperative Coronary Bypass Patients

赵枫,徐志云,邹良建,梅举
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-9934.2004.10.003
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the ventilatory and hemodynamic effects of bip hasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation with synchronized intermitten t mandatory ventilation (S-IMV) in sedated patients after coronary artery bypas s grafting (CABG). Methods 26 patients without evidence of preoperative respirat ory dysfunction and an uncomplicated intraoperative course were investigated. Th e patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups starting either with BiPAP or S-IMV mode. Hemodynamic measurements and blood gas analysis were perfo r med during sedation with 2.0 mg·kg -1·h -1 propofol in the primary mode, after wards switching to the alternative ventilatory mode, and again to the primary mo de. Results Inspiratory peak pressure decreased significantly during BiPAP in p atients of both groups (P 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters, blood-gas analysi s and other ventilatory parameters did not vary with the ventilatory mode. Conclusion BiPAP ventilation has no significant differentiating effects on hemodynamics a nd pulmonary gas exchange compared with S-IMV when used for ventilatory suppor t in patients after CABG and thus it is safe and reliable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?