Evoked potentials in obsessive-compulsive disorder:a follow-up study

肖泽萍,陈兴时,张明岛,楼翡璎,陈珏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:1006-7884.2004.02.009
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the status of evoked potentials in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods Evoked potentials P300, auditory brainstem response ( ABR) and visual evoked potential (VEP) were recorded from 35 OCD patients using a Nicolet Spirit Instrument, and compared with that of 28 normal controls ( NC). And 23 OCD patients were followed up after 5 months with the same markers. Results ( 1 ) Compared with NC, OCD patients showed decreased P3 of P300 amplitude [ (5. 90 ±μ 2. 10)μVvs. (3.51±1.60)μV, P0.01], delayed V latency [(5. 50± 0. 33 ) ms vs. (6. 40±0.41) ms , P 0. 01 ] and increased V amplitude[(0. 16±0. 09) μV vs. (0. 35±0. 10) , P 0. 01 ] of ABR and delayed P2 of VEP latency [ ( 183 ± 28) ms vs. (199 ± 39) ms, P 0. 05 ; ( 2) The following up measures of evoked potentials suggested that decreased P3 of P300 amplitude and delayed P2 of VEP latency might be state markers of OCD, while decreased V amplitude and delayed V of ABR latency might be trait markers of OCD. Conclusion The P300 and VEP variations in OCD patients might correlate with the symptoms status of OCD, while the significance of ABR variations should be determined in future study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?