Using Event Related Potentials to Characterise Inhibitory Control and Self-Monitoring Across Impulsive and Compulsive Phenotypes: A Dimensional Approach to OCD

Sakshi Dhir,Kaelasha Tyler,Lucy Albertella,Samuel R. Chamberlain,Wei-Peng Teo,Murat Yücel,Rebecca A. Segrave
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s109285292200075x
2022-04-29
CNS Spectrums
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: "Subsyndromal" obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms (OCDSs) are common and cause impaired psychosocial functioning. OCDSs are better captured by dimensional models of psychopathology, as opposed to categorical diagnoses. However, such dimensional approaches require a deep understanding of the underlying neurocognitive drivers and impulsive and compulsive traits (ie, neurocognitive phenotypes) across symptoms. This study investigated inhibitory control and self-monitoring across impulsivity, compulsivity, and their interaction in individuals (n = 40) experiencing mild-moderate OCDSs.METHODS: EEG recording concurrent with the stop-signal task was used to elicit event-related potentials (ERPs) indexing inhibitory control (ie, N2 and P3) and self-monitoring (ie, error-related negativity and correct-related negativity (CRN): negativity following erroneous or correct responses, respectively).RESULTS: During unsuccessful stopping, individuals high in both impulsivity and compulsivity displayed enhanced N2 amplitude, indicative of conflict between the urge to respond and need to stop (<i>F</i>(3, 33) = 1.48, <i>P</i> &lt; .05, 95% Cl [-0.01, 0.001]). Individuals high in compulsivity and low in impulsivity showed reduced P3 amplitude, consistent with impairments in monitoring failed inhibitory control (<i>F</i>(3, 24) = 2.033, <i>P</i> &lt; .05, 95% CI [-0.002, 0.045]). Following successful stopping, high compulsivity (independent of impulsivity) was associated with lower CRN amplitude, reflecting hypo-monitoring of correct responses (<i>F</i>(4, 32) = 4.76, <i>P</i> &lt; .05, 95% CI [0.01, 0.02]), and with greater OCDS severity (<i>F</i>(3, 36) = 3.32, <i>P</i> &lt; .05, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19]).CONCLUSION: The current findings provide evidence for differential, ERP-indexed inhibitory control and self-monitoring profiles across impulsive and compulsive phenotypes in OCDSs.
psychiatry,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?