Effects of The Different Irrigation-Fertilization Optimization Models on Leaf Growth and Population Light Distribution of Winter Wheat

李志勇,郭予琦,王璞,Marion Boening-Zilkens,W.Claupein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6060-B.2003.02.003
2003-01-01
Abstract:As compared with the traditional irrigation-traditional lertilization, the following results were ob-lainecl-lhe improved traditional irrigation-optimized fertilization: shorter and thicker flag leaf, 2nd leaf, 3nd leaf and 4nd leaf from top, reduced total area of these leave, bigger mean canopy leaf tilt angle, tighter plant type, smaller light extinction coefficient (K), higher ratio of light penetration in the upper, middle and lower parts of the wheat canopy; the improved optimized irrigation-traditional fertilization; longer flag leaf, 2nd leaf, 3nd leaf and shorter 4nd leaf from top, increased total area of these thinner and looser leaves, smaller mean canopy leaf tilt angle, looser plant type, greater light extinction coefficient . lowerer ratio of light penetration in the upper, middle and lower parts of the wheat canopy; the improved optimized irrigation-optimized and the improved optimized irrigation-optimized fertilization with crop residues; a bit reduced total area of these leaves, almost the same leaf thickness, mean canopy leaf lilt angle, light extinction coefficient, ratio of light penetration in the upper, middle and lower parts of the wheat canopy, and fair plant type. The experimental results showed insignificant difference in winter wheat yield between the five treatments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?