Contrast-enhanced Three Dimensional MR Angiography of Pulmonary Artery and Pulmonary Perfusion Imaging in Pig: a Comparison Study with DSA

刘士远,肖湘生,徐雪元,董伟华,董生,陈柏松,张沉石,李玉莉,刘会敏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2002.07.019
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To optimize the contrast injection protocol for the contrast enhanced thoracic 3D MR angiography (3D CEMRA) and pulmonary perfusion imaging (PPI), and to evaluate its value in the diagnosis of experimental acute pulmonary embolism in pigs compared with DSA Methods CEMRA and PPI were performed in 6 healthy pigs by using the Siemens Vision Plus 1 5 T system and compared with DSA The gadolinium contrast medium was injected at a rate 3 ml/s with different dosage (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 ml) Then the pulmonary embolism models were made on those pigs using gelfoam granules, CEMRA and PPI were performed again using 20 ml contrast medium and 3 ml/s injection velocity, and its value in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism was discussed Results The signal intensities and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the pig pulmonary arteries kept increasing with the dose of gadolinium agents, but the best vessel pulmonary contrast occurred in doses of 10~15 ml (0 250~0 375 mmol/kg), while the satisfied dose for PPI was 15~20 ml (0 375~0 500 mmol/kg) CEMRA demonstrated less obstructed pulmonary arteries than DSA (8/10), but it became better (10/10) when combined with PPI Pulmonary infarction showed wedge shaped perfusion defects, where the signal intensity were lower than that of normal areas (137 86±45 32 vs 330 14±46 52, t =8 40, P 0 001) Conclusion The best dose of contrast agent for pulmonary artery 3D CEMRA was 0 250~0 375 mmol/kg, and that for lung perfusion was 0 375~0 500 mmol/kg It showed that CEMRA combined with PPI were better than DSA in demonstrating pulmonary embolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?