Efficacy Comparison between Artificial Liver PDF and PE + CHDF in the Treatment of Late Liver Failure

Guan-lin ZHOU,Lun-li ZHANG,Chun-wen LIU,Pei-hua YANG,Qiong ZHANG,Zhi-jun XIE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5779.2014.04.012

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To evaluate and compare the efficacy of the artificial liver Plasma filtration dialysis(PDF)mode and plasma exchange(PE)plus continuous hemofiltration dialysis(CHDF)mode in the treatment of the end-stage liver failure. Methods:40 patients with the end-stage liver failure were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group;on the basis of comprehensive treatment the observation group was given PDF medical treatment where-as the control group was given PE plus CHDF therapy. The biochemical improvement of liver function and the three-month mortality before and after the treatment were observed and compared. Results:The control group had the better biochemi-cal improvement than observation group(P ﹥ 0. 05),but the two groups had the same three-month mortality. Conclusion:PE plus CHDF therapy on the basis of comprehensive treatment can get a better improvement in renal function and dehy-dration effects than PDF therapy mode,while there is no difference between the PDF therapy and PE plus CHDF therapy on liver function improvement. But the PDF therapy on the basis of comprehensive treatment can save the therapy time and treatment costs than PE plus CHDF therapy mode. There is no difference between the PDF therapy and PE plus CHDF therapy on the three-month mortality.