Remediation of Cr~(6+) in Chromite Ore Processing Residue by Sodium Thiosulfate and Sodium Phosphate

FENG Jing-xuan,LI Yun-yi,SHI Shuai,LIU Yang-sheng,WANG Qun-hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2015.11.018
2015-01-01
Abstract:Batch experiments were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of the remediation of Cr(VI) in COPR by the reductant sodium thiosulfate(Na2S2O3), and the mechanism for the reduction of Cr(VI) into Cr(III) was tested. After remediation treatment, phosphate was added to immobilize the Cr(III)-containing compounds in COPR. Different reaction time and dosages of reagents were investigated to evaluate the efficiency of Cr(VI) reduction. The results indicated that sodium thiosulfate could effectively remove Cr(VI) from COPR. When the molar ratio of Na2S2O3 to Cr(VI) was 12: 1and the treating time was 15 days, 70% of Cr(VI) was removed; afterwards, further increases of reagent dosage and/or treating time had little effect on the removal of Cr(VI). Cr(III)-containing crystallines were observed after phosphate was added as an immobilizer, which significantly reduced the content of Cr(VI) in the COPR leachate. When the molar ratio of phosphate to Cr(III) was 4: 1, the leachable Cr(VI) was 6.1mg/L, which was much lower than the required concentration(≤15mg/L) in China Hazardous Waste Identification Criteria(GB 5085.3-2007). Moreover, the two-step treatment was more beneficial to remove Cr(VI) than the one-step treatment(i.e., Na2S2O3 and phosphate were simultaneously added into the COPR).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?