A Comparative Study of Endoluminal Catheter-Based Ultrasonography and Intravenous Pyelography on Diagnosis of Diseases in the Upper Urinary Tract in Human

HU Bing,FENG Liang,ZHU Jia-an,YING Tao,Wen yun,ZHOU Yong-chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3630.2004.z4.017
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical value of endoluminal catheter-based ultrasonography with intravenous pyelography (IVP) on diagnosis of diseases in the upper urinary tract in human. Methods: Thirty patients were examined by using endoluminal sonography and IVP. All the cases were confirmed by pathology or other techniques. Results: The detectable rate of tumor in renal pelvis as examined by ultrasonograpghy was 92%(12/13), and was 54%(7/13) by IVP. The detectable rate of tumor less than 10mm in size as examined by ultrasonograpghy was 100%(6/6), and was 17%(1/6) by IVP. Masses and blood vessel abnormality surrounding renal pelvis could be detected by endoluminal ultrasonography, but it was difficult for IVP. Endoluminal ultrasonography could be used to detect the reason for ureter obstruction, while IVP couldn’t. Conclusions: IVP can be used to display the whole shape of upper urinary tract in one picture, while endoluminal ultrasonography can be used to detect tiny lesions of upper urinary tract precisely, and to detect their positions within or surrounding urinary tract correctly. IVP is good for screening, and it is better to do endoluminal ultrasonography after IVP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?