Comparison Between Intravenous Urography and Computed Tomography Urography in Diagnosing Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Chong Xie,Jianming Guo,Guomin Wang,Hang Wang
2011-01-01
Nephro-Urology Monthly
Abstract:Background: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is mostly a benign, congenital condition that remains an enigma in terms of diagnosis. Despite several advances in morphological and functional imaging of UPJO, controversies still remain about the optimal imaging method to diagnose UPJO. Intravenous urography (IVU) has been standardized and is a familiar technique to urologists, however, its diagnostic efficacy is not high and thus another examination is usually needed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare CTU and IVU in the assessment of patients with UPJO. Patients and Methods: Sixty-one patients with final diagnosis of UPJO received both IVU and CTU before operation. The CTU examination included three phase axial scan: noncontrast (phase I), nephrographic phase (phase II), excretory phase (phase III) and CTU images were obtained by coronal reconstruction of phase I and III. Two radiologists who were unaware of the findings independently interpreted these examinations. The diagnosis of both imaging studies were compared with the final diagnosis and the two examinations were compared by the results of diagnostic accuracy for different causes of disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?