Behavioral Finance:Overconfidence and Mixed Expected Earning Model

杨春鹏,吴冲锋

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2848.2004.01.005

2004-01-01

Abstract:On the basis of the investor's overconfidence, this paper studies the impact of investor's psychology on expected securities earning, and, builds the mixed expected earning model, proving that CAPM model is the special one, to which MEEmodel will degenerate when there is no overconfidence.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A Strategic Asset Pricing Model for Relative Performance Concern

Jianfeng Yu,Weidong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2016.1195255

2016-01-01

Abstract:We propose a strategic asset pricing model for the relative performance concern with heterogeneous beliefs in the framework of Nash equilibrium. In our model, the presence of heterogeneous beliefs generates the upward pressure on the stock market volatility and gives rise to the separation of agents' perceived Sharpe ratios. We show that if one of the agents temporarily wins the market, the presence of relative performance concern will reduce the impacts of the winner and make the investors who have been edged out of the market more inclined to return. Besides, the sufficiently strong concern of relative performance will bring investors the extreme aversion to losing and get them to trade similarly.
An Empirical Study on the Overconfidence of Investors under the Overall Perspective

WANG Xiang-ning,LI Yue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13860/j.cnki.sltj.2010.06.022

2010-01-01

Abstract:Overconfidence is a key hypothesis in behavioral finance.This paper researches into the presence of overconfidence in China's stock market by linear models estimated with feasible generalized least squares(FGLS),Granger causality test and exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model.The results show that overconfidence is prevalent among Chinese investors and this psychological bias has exerted prominent influences on the investment behavior of the investors;the difference between the level of overconfidence in bull and bear market is not statistically significant,which is different from the U.S.market.
Does Overconfidence Always Matter for Asset Prices?

Weixing Wu,Yongxiang Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850701221923

2009-01-01

Applied Economics Letters

Abstract:Research in behaviour finance has provided seemingly persuasive evidences that overconfidence affects asset prices. We provide a model with model uncertainty and overconfidence in which overconfidence could have no effect on asset prices.
The Overconfident, or the More Informed?

Hefa Gui,Mingchao Cai,Yongxiang Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850601018429

2009-01-01

Applied Economics Letters

Abstract:We discuss some problems with the modelling methods in the overconfidence literature. We argue that overconfidence models should be well constructed such that overconfident investors in the behavioural model could be distinguished clearly from the more informed investors in the rational asset-pricing model.
Consistent Analyst Expectation Error and Earnings Management: Evidence from China

Zhengyi Zhou,Chongfeng Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2015.1068065

2015-01-01

Abstract:Using data from the Chinese A-share market in 2004-12, we show how cognitive bias of individual analysts led to counterproductive effect in less-developed financial markets. We form an ex ante measure of analysts' expectation error, a measure suitable for markets with a short history. We find that star analysts tend to be more optimistic than ordinary analysts, and their biased opinions influence other analysts because of analyst herding behavior. Two-stage least square regression results suggest that consistent expectation errors among analysts can lead to earnings management. These insights are valuable to investors and regulators.
Behavioral asset pricing under expected feedback mode

X.U. Shaojun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102508

IF: 8.235

2023-01-20

International Review of Financial Analysis

Abstract:We develop an enhanced DSSW model of behavior asset pricing by introducing the expected feedback mode. Through numerical simulation, it has been theoretically proved that risky asset price is jointly determined by trend extrapolated effect of expected feedback traders and the creating space effect of noise traders, and that price fluctuation depends on the expected feedback coefficient. As expected feedback traders' expectation return has been realized and the above two effects are obviously imbalance, their confidence will deteriorate prior to price collapse, and eventually achieve self-fulfilling expectation of price reversal in the process of price momentum. This model sheds lights on financial anomalies of trade size clustering and the formation of stock bubble, besides it provides a new perspective for avoiding the "bewitching" trading and reducing market volatility.

business, finance
A Comment on the Modeling Methods in Overconfidence Research

Gui Hefa,Cai Mingchao,Wu Weixing,Wang Yongxiang

2007-01-01

Abstract:The paper firstly discusses some problems in the modeling methods in the overconfidence literature. Then the author argues that overconfidence models should be well constructed such that they could be distinguished clearly from rational models with the structure of informed and more informed investors. Another pitfall with these overconfidence models is that they cannot tell the rebalancing effect from overconfidence effect when explaining trade and overtrading. Finally, the paper also discusses other problems in existent research, including the biased understanding of overconfidence and the psychological foundations of overconfidence.
Managerial Overconfidence and Over-Investment: Empirical Evidence from China

Xia Wang,Min Zhang,Fusheng Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-009-0022-2

2009-01-01

Frontiers of Business Research in China

Abstract:Based on data of A-shares listed companies in China, this paper studies the relationship between managerial overconfidence and firms’ overinvestment behaviors. We first define a manager as an overconfident one if his or her compan’s announced earnings forecast is higher than its actual earnings at least once in 2002–2004. After controlling such factors as growing opportunity, size, etc., we find that overconfident managers tend to over-invest and their overinvestment behaviors have higher sensitivity to cash flow generated by financing activities. In other word, when their firms obtain an abundant cash flow from financing activities, overconfident managers will over-invest, or vise versa. Contrary to other relevant studies, we find that the sensitivity between over-investment and free cash flow has little to do with managerial overconfidence. Robustness testing is conducted to verify the reliability of our conclusions. We also use “whether top managers increase their holdings of company shares within the observation period” as a substitute variable for managerial overconfidence and run the tests again, and the results are consistent with the above. Finally, findings of this paper indicate that it is necessary for firms to establish a scientific and rigorous investment managing mechanism.
Confidence and the stock market: an agent-based approach

Mario A Bertella,Felipe R Pires,Ling Feng,Harry Eugene Stanley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083488

IF: 3.7

2014-01-08

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Using a behavioral finance approach we study the impact of behavioral bias. We construct an artificial market consisting of fundamentalists and chartists to model the decision-making process of various agents. The agents differ in their strategies for evaluating stock prices, and exhibit differing memory lengths and confidence levels. When we increase the heterogeneity of the strategies used by the agents, in particular the memory lengths, we observe excess volatility and kurtosis, in agreement with real market fluctuations--indicating that agents in real-world financial markets exhibit widely differing memory lengths. We incorporate the behavioral traits of adaptive confidence and observe a positive correlation between average confidence and return rate, indicating that market sentiment is an important driver in price fluctuations. The introduction of market confidence increases price volatility, reflecting the negative effect of irrationality in market behavior.
Overconfidence,Limited Participation and Asset Price Bubbles

Wu Weixing,Wang Yongxiang,Liang Hengyi

2006-01-01

Abstract:Limited participation can arise endogenously in the presence of model uncertainty, and overconfident investors enter the market differently from the rational investors. Our model generates novel predications on how overconfidence relates to limited participation, excess entry and asset pricing. This model has strong empirical implication about the relations among the liquidity premium, the shareholder structure and the risk premium. The paper shows that investors who are overconfident about asset mean payoffs have larger non-participation regions than investors with rational. But investors who are overconfident about asset mean payoffs are more aggressive in their participation regions than investors with rational. Further, this model derives the corresponding relations between the shareholder structures and the equilibrium asset prices in different cases.
The Study on Overconfidence and Overtrading of Chinese Individual Investors

Liao Li,He Peifei,Zhang Weiqiang,Shen Hongbo

2013-01-01

Abstract:Using account data from a security firm in China,this paper investigates how overconfidence affects investors' trading frequency and trading returns.We find that after controlling for other factors:(1) As overconfidence is enhanced in investors who experience high returns,there is a positive relationship between past performance and subsequent trading activity;(2) This pattern is less stronger among those experienced investors because investors learn their ability more precisely with more trading experience;(3) Overconfidence increases the probability of wrong investment decisions,those who trade most always have lower net returns.
An Explanation from Behavioral Finance on Stock Market Anomlies and Its E Nlightenment to China

戴志敏,姜宇霏

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-148x.2003.04.039

2003-01-01

Abstract:Since the 1980's, many stock market anomalies have emerged vastly, and shaken the basis of classical efficient market theory radically. To these anomalies, the new theory —behavioral finance, can give us some more convincing explanations than before from a totally different perspective. Our stock market is not efficient yet, so it also sheds light upon the investing strategies for the institutional investors of China.
Investor Expectations, Earnings Management, and Asset Prices

Kai Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2852553

2016-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper examines the implications of investor expectations for the joint determination of earnings manipulation and asset prices. Three alternative models of investor expectations are studied: constant-gain learning, regime-shifting beliefs, and accounting-information-system (AIS) beliefs. I use the simulated method of moments (SMM) to estimate the most plausible model that matches the actual data. AIS beliefs and regime-shifting beliefs are shown to best explain the empirical moments of 63 percent and 32 percent of S&P 500 firms, respectively. Regression analysis suggests that the three models offer different predictions on the existence and magnitude of several empirical regularities including a positive earnings response coefficient, the discretionary accruals anomaly, and return momentum.
Trading Behavior Styles and a Behavior Model

HUANG Feng,YANG Zhao-jun,HU Wei-wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2005.05.019

2005-01-01

Abstract:Based on cognitive psychology and prospect theory,this paper analyses the three types of stock-traders in the qualitative perspective and mathematical model: Informed traders who are composed mainly of institutional investors;positive feedback traders and conservative traders both of which are uninformed and come mainly from the group of individual investors.By a behavior model we can get a quite different result from rational market theory: Those irrational traders would have a significant influence on stock prices along the process of pursuing information rent.Overreaction phenomenon can be interpreted by a viewpoint of positive feedback.
Investor Sentiment and Paradigm Shifts in Equity Return Forecasting

Liya Chu,Xue-Zhong He,Kai Li,Jun Tu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3834

IF: 5.4

2022-04-05

Management Science

Abstract:This study investigates the impact of investor sentiment on excess equity return forecasting. A high (low) investor sentiment may weaken the connection between fundamental economic (behavioral-based nonfundamental) predictors and market returns. We find that although fundamental variables can be strong predictors when sentiment is low, they tend to lose their predictive power when investor sentiment is high. Nonfundamental predictors perform well during high-sentiment periods while their predictive ability deteriorates when investor sentiment is low. These paradigm shifts in equity return forecasting provide a key to understanding and resolving the lack of predictive power for both fundamental and nonfundamental variables debated in recent studies. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, finance.

management,operations research & management science
The Capital Assets Pricing Model Based on Attitude to One-Side Risk and Its Empirical Test

HUANG Bo,LI Zhan,GU Meng-di

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1006-2467.2006.09.018

2006-01-01

Abstract:From the different attitude of representative investor to downside risk and upside risk,assets pricing models in one period were put forward based on bear and bull market.Then,the data of Chinese stock market were used to make an empirical test.The outcome indicates that by contrast to the traditional β,the β~-and β~+ according to bear and bull have more powerful influence on securities' returns;the β~-and β~+ are positively and negatively relative to securities' returns respectively;moreover,the indices about firm's characters have some influence on securities' returns as well.
Macroeconomic Perceptions, Financial Constraints, and Anomalies

Wei He,Zhiwei Su,Jianfeng Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103952

IF: 8.9

2024-01-01

Journal of Financial Economics

Abstract:This paper studies the heterogeneous effects of subjective macroeconomic expectations on the cross-section of equity returns. We argue that an upward revision in expectations of macroeconomic productivity might be accompanied by an excessive increase in investment and external financing, inflated current equity prices, and thus lowered subsequent returns, particularly for financially constrained firms. Thus, following upward revisions in expectations of macroeconomic productivity, subsequent returns are relatively low for small firms, value firms, low-investment firms, risky firms, unprofitable firms, low-quality firms, and financially distressed firms—all of which are more financially constrained. In sharp contrast, following downward revisions in expectations of macroeconomic productivity, these categories of firms earn relatively high subsequent returns. We find that revisions in subjective macroeconomic expectations induce strong predictable time variation in a large set of anomalies. In particular, favorable revisions in expectations of macroeconomic productivity predict significantly stronger profitability, quality, distress, and low-risk anomalies but weaker value, investment, and size anomalies.
Behavioral Corporate Finance:A Synthesis and Implications in China

CUI Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2010.04.017

2010-01-01

Abstract:This paper reviews theories and evidences related to behavioral corporate finance.It describes the interactions between investors and managers of the firm,and summaries the theoretical models,analysis and empirical evidence from investors' irrationality and managers' irrationality perspective respectively.It offers intuitive and realistic explanations for capital budgeting decisions,capital structure decisions,dividend policies and etc.It also sheds lights on the solutions of the more complicated problems within and without the firm.
An Empirical Investigation for Value-Indifference-Based Asset Pricing Model—With an Explanation for the Equity Premium Puzzle

LIQIANG SUN,XIAOYUE CHEN

2008-01-01

Abstract:The classical theories of asset pricing are being suspected and leaving"puz- zles"unsolved for many years,and utility function has been the obstacle of development of as- set pricing theory.Assuming asset prices follow Ito processes Chen and Sun(2007)estab- lished a new asset pricing model based on value indifference platform,where the value indif- ference judgments become the precondition of the utility indifference judgments.And then the model is extended to the case where asset prices follow normal distributions.This model es- tablishes the direct quantitative relationship between return and risk,and hints value indiffer- ence among stocks,risky bonds and riskless assets,and also the long-term equilibriums based on the value indifference.A new risk factor investment evaluation period T is imported to the unified equilibrium structure,which displays a wide research field in the future.Using stock market data this article tries to provide empirical evidences to supporting the quantitative rela- tionship and investment evaluation period indicated by the model,and also explain the equity premium puzzle at the same time.The results show that this model can interpret the equity premiums in America,China mainland and Hong Kong stock markets respectively,even the returns of these markets have different standard deviations.For details the average risk pre- miums converge to the theoretical values calculated by the model,and the differences between actual risk premiums and their theoretical correspondences are very small(less than 2% in most cases)and not significant.By simulations of 100 000 times,we find that the curve of ac- tual values crosses that of theoretical values at the point where the investment evaluation peri- od is about one year,which is consistent with our prior analysis.The simulation results are perfect in America stock market while there are a little larger errors in China mainland and Hong Kong stock markets.The probable reason is that the theoretical values are sensitive near the convergence points and the short histories of China mainland and Hong Kong stock markets induce larger influences of returns of certain years and so larger volatilities of long- term means.Actually this problem reveals the huge application spaces of the model in emer- ging markets.Moreover the calculation errors induced by the lack of appropriate riskless re- turns in the two markets may be another reason.To summarize the empirical evidences sup- port our opinion that this model can precisely describe the relationship between return and risk of market portfolio and explain the equity premium puzzle successfully.The results indi- cate that the high risk premiums of stock markets are a kind of compensation for the probable losses when the investment evaluation period of investors is about one year.Moreover we also test the model under normal distribution using America stock market data and get the same conclusions.
Influence of Psychological and Emotional Factors on the Venture Enterprise Value and the Investment Decision-Making

G.U. Jing,Chen Hao,Zhang Xian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.117

2013-01-01

Procedia Computer Science

Abstract:The development of behavioral finance has proposed an outstretched idea for traditional model, that the irrational behavior of venture entrepreneurs and venture capitalists has an important impact on the corporation's investment decision-making. This paper, based on the optimal effort model for double-sided moral hazard, has discussed the influence of the entrepreneurs’ and venture capitalists’ psychological and emotional factors on the venture enterprise value and the investment decision-making. And it turned out that moderate confidence of entrepreneurs and investors are able to offset the impact of moral hazard. Overconfidence of entrepreneurs may lead to lower corporate value, but it may also make the venture enterprise with a negative NPV get investment, while overconfidence of investors may cause overreaction in investment decision-making. Entrepreneurs’ negative and conservative psychology may result in the reduction of firm value, and the venture enterprise with positive net revenue may face the refusal to invest. The venture capitalists’ negative and conservative psychology may result in under reaction in the decision-making process. The research is helpful to the decision making when people analyze venture capitalist’ and entrepreneurs’ decisions under different circumstances of emotional psychology.

Behavioral Finance:Overconfidence and Mixed Expected Earning Model

A Strategic Asset Pricing Model for Relative Performance Concern

An Empirical Study on the Overconfidence of Investors under the Overall Perspective

Does Overconfidence Always Matter for Asset Prices?

The Overconfident, or the More Informed?

Consistent Analyst Expectation Error and Earnings Management: Evidence from China

Behavioral asset pricing under expected feedback mode

A Comment on the Modeling Methods in Overconfidence Research

Managerial Overconfidence and Over-Investment: Empirical Evidence from China

Confidence and the stock market: an agent-based approach

Overconfidence,Limited Participation and Asset Price Bubbles

The Study on Overconfidence and Overtrading of Chinese Individual Investors

An Explanation from Behavioral Finance on Stock Market Anomlies and Its E Nlightenment to China

Investor Expectations, Earnings Management, and Asset Prices

Trading Behavior Styles and a Behavior Model

Investor Sentiment and Paradigm Shifts in Equity Return Forecasting

The Capital Assets Pricing Model Based on Attitude to One-Side Risk and Its Empirical Test

Macroeconomic Perceptions, Financial Constraints, and Anomalies

Behavioral Corporate Finance:A Synthesis and Implications in China

An Empirical Investigation for Value-Indifference-Based Asset Pricing Model—With an Explanation for the Equity Premium Puzzle

Influence of Psychological and Emotional Factors on the Venture Enterprise Value and the Investment Decision-Making