Bioequivalence of desogestrel/ethinylestradiol tablets in healthy Chinese Han nationality volunteers

毕继宏,郭湘洁,李钊,徐红蓉,桂幼伦,朱健平,李雪宁,朱焰
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2015.01.013
2015-01-01
Abstract:AIM To assess the relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of two types(test and reference) of desogestrel/ethinylestradiol tablets in Chinese Han ethnic volunteers. METHODS The study was performed as an open label, randomized, two- period, single dose cross- over bioequivalence study in twenty- two Chinese Han ethnic healthy male subjects. Both test and reference tablets contain desogestrel 0.15 mg and ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg. The two treatments were separated by a washout period of two weeks. The plasma concentration of 3- ketone- desogestrel( 3- K- DG) was determined by HPLC- MS/MS, and the plasma concentration of ethinylestradiol was determined by radioimmunoassay method. The pharmacokinetic parameters and bioequivalence of the two types of desogestrel/ethinylestradiol tablets were calculated by Win Nonlin software.RESULTS Main pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and the reference preparation were as following: tmaxof3- K- DG were( 1.50 ± 0.44) and( 1.75 ± 0.36) h, cmaxwere( 1.22 ± 0.44) and( 1.15 ± 0.42) μg·L-1,AUC0-twere(27.19 ± 12.13) and(26.13 ± 10.72) μg·h·L-1, t1/2were( 58.61 ± 100.92) and( 60.42 ±37.36) h; tmaxof ethinylestradiol were(2.00 ± 0.41) and(2.00 ± 0.37) h, cmaxwere(147.73 ± 18.66) and(147.77 ± 18.34) ng·L-1, AUC0-twere(1 999.97 ± 1 113.47) and(1 899.12 ± 909.95) ng·h·L-1, t1/2were( 19.47 ± 12.19) and( 19.22 ± 9.34) h, respectively. There was no significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and the reference preparation(P 0.05). The relative bioavailabilities of 3- K- DG and EE of the test preparation were( 104.07 ± 32.78) % and( 105.31 ± 45.31) %( n = 22), respectively.CONCLUSION The established HPLC- MS/MS method and radioimmunoassay method were accurate and sensitive, and the test and the reference of desogestrel/ethinylestradiol tables had bioequivalence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?