Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalance of domestic compound glibenclamide and metformin in chinese healthy volunteers

李雪宁,陈伟力,徐红蓉,余琛,刘罡一,贾晶莹
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6821.2004.05.008
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of a new domesticcompound glibenclamide and metformin and its relative bioavailability in healthyvolunteers. Methods A randomized, open, crossover study of 20 healthy Chinesevolunteers was conducted with a oral single dose of capsule (glibenclamide 1.25mg and metformin 250 mg per pill) 2 pills or glibenclamide 2.5 mg and metformin 500mg were given at the same time. The plasma concentrations of glibenclamide andmetformin in healthy volunteers were determined by an validated LC-MS/MS methodand were assessed with non-compartment model to obtain the pharmacokineticparameters. The relative bioavailability of compound glibenclamide and metformincapsule versus glibenclamide and metformin were calculated. Results Thepharmacokinetic parameters of glibenclamide for orally administered domesticglibenclamide capsule and glibenclamide and metformin were as following: AUC0-t :(603.32±196.61) and (581.70±195.01) ng.h.mL-1;Cmax :(123.46±27.03)and (128.28±3.67) ng.mL-1;tmax: (2.8±0.7) and (2.6±0.6) h; t1/2:(6.54±1.24)and (6.89±1.73) h. The pharmacokinetic parameters of metformin for orallyadministered domestic glibenclamide capsule and glibenclamide and metforminwere as following: AUC0-t : (7832.97±2603.38) and (7765.52±2870.85) ng. h.mL-1;Cmax: (1377.55±476.60) and (1367.40±551.19)ng.mL-1; tmax; (2.7±0.9) and (2.0±0.5) h; t1/2: (5.72±1.24) and (5.81±1.51)h, respectively. There were no significant differences(P0.05) in AUC0-t , tmax, Cmax and t1/2 between two preparations.The relative bioavailability of glibenclamide and metformin of glibenclamide casule were (104.82±19.27)% and (107.30±46.40)% compared with glibenclamide and metformin tablets. No clear adverse events were observed during this study.Conclusion glibenclamide capsule and glibenclamide and metformin tablets were bioequivalent.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?