Post-Marketing Reevaluation of Bioequivalénce of Metformin Hydrochloride Enteric-Coated Tablets

张丹,杨漫,韩静,王晓琳,张丽娜,张娅喃,肖雪,杜爱华,刘曼,王振龙,王涛,刘会臣
2012-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To reevaluate the bioequivalence of marked metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets. METHODS: Using method 2 described in the appendix X D and apparatus 1 described in the appendix X C in Chinese Pharmacopoeia(edition 2010), the in vitro release of metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets from different pharmaceutical factories (A, B, C, and D) was investigated. The contents were measured by utlraviolet (UV) spectroscopy. Generic tablets from factory A and D were chosen to be test 1 and test 2 preparations, with the innovative metformin hydrochloride tablets (Glucophage) as the reference preparation. In a randomized, three-way crossover study, 21 healthy male volunteers were given a single oral dose of test 1, test 2 and reference preparations containing 500 mg of metformin hydrochloride. Plasma concentrations of metformin were determined by LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were calculated. The bioequivalence between test 1 and reference preparation, test 2 and reference preparation, and the bioequivalence between the two test preparations were evaluated. RESULTS: The in vitro release of metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets from factory B, C and D met the standard of Chinese Pharmacopoeia(the supplement edition of 2010) while that of the tablets from factory A did not. Metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets from factory A and D were chosen to be test 1 and test 2 preparations, respectively. The F 0-t and F 0-∞ were (72.8 ± 9.7)% and (73.2 ± 10.0)% for test 1 preparation, and (45.5 ± 16.2)% and (46.2 ± 16.0)% for test 2 preparation, respectively. It was failed to conclude that test 1 and reference preparation were bioinequivalent. Test 2 and reference preparation were bioinequivalent, and the two test preparations were also bioinequivalent. CONCLUSION: The bioinequivalence risk of metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets is high. For metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated tablets, not only conducting pre-marketing bioequivalence study with proper reference preparation, but also enhancing post-marketing surveillance and reevaluation of bioequivalence are very important for maintaining the consistency of drugs quality. Copyright 2012 by the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?