Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

How to Strengthen the Responsibility of Prosecutors: Rethinking the Head Prosecutor System

On the Basic Philosophy of Criminal Reconciliation——Comparative Study between Zhejiang "Fengqiao Experience" and U.S. VOR Model

On Objective Responsibility of Prosecutors

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

Dilemma and Adaptation:Reforming the System of City Administering County in Multi-level Government

Chief Prosecutor System --another Commentary on Judicial Independence

Something Lost, Something Gained: Changes in China’s Procuratorate in Response to the Reform of the National Supervision System

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

From Supporting Suit to Commonweal Suit——On the Basis of Necessary Choice of Civil Administrative Procuratorial Right

Challenging the People Supervisors System

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

On the Reform and Perfecting of Adjudication Supervision of People's Procuratorate

Responsibility and Amends System on China's Real Estate Register--Study on Greffier Examination and Appointment System and Register Responsibility System

Interpretation of Deepening the Reform of the People’s Supervisor System Solutions--Based on the Promotion of Judicial Democracy and the Strengthening of the External Supervision of Procuratorial Organs

On the Outline of Improving the Civil Procuratorial Supervision System

Discussion on the Dynamical Mechanism of Procurator Organs to Investigate the Crime

On Civil Prosecutorial Suggestion

Re-Classification and Theoretical Study of the Civil Prosecutorial Suggestions

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform