Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate two distortion correction techniques for diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (DW‐ssEPI) on a 0.35T MR‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The effects of sequence optimization through enabling parallel imaging (PI) and selecting appropriate bandwidth on spatial distortion were first evaluated on the 0.35T MRgRT system using a spatial integrity phantom. Field map (FM) and reversed gradient (RG) corrections were then performed on the optimized protocol to further reduce distortion. An open‐source toolbox was used to quantify the spatial displacement before and after distortion correction. To evaluate ADC accuracy and repeatability of the optimized protocol, as well as impacts of distortion correction on ADC values, the optimized protocol was scanned twice on a diffusion phantom. The calculated ADC values were compared with reference ADCs using paired t‐test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the two repetitions, as well as between before and after FM/RG correction were calculated to evaluate ADC repeatability and effects of distortion correction. Six patients were recruited to assess the in‐vivo performance. The optimal distortion correction technique was identified by visual assessment. To quantify distortion reduction, tumor and critical structures were contoured on the turbo spin echo (TSE) image (reference image), the DW‐ssEPI image, and the distortion corrected images independently by two radiation oncologists. Mean distance to agreement (MDA) and DICE coefficient between contours on the reference images and the diffusion images were calculated. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from the original DW‐ssEPI images and the distortion corrected images were compared using Bland‐Altman analysis.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Sequence optimization played a vital role in improving the spatial integrity, and spatial distortion was proportional to the total readout time. Before the correction, distortion of the optimized protocol (PI and high bandwidth) was 1.50±0.89 mm in a 100 mm radius and 2.21±1.39 mm in a 175 mm radius for the central plane. FM corrections reduced the distortions to 0.42±0.27 mm and 0.67±0.49 mm respectively, and RG reduced distortion to 0.40±0.22 mm and 0.64±0.47 mm respectively. The optimized protocol provided accurate and repeatable ADC quantification on the diffusion phantom. The calculated ADC values were consistent before and after FM/RG correction. For the patient study, the FM correction was unable to reduce chemical shift artifacts whereas the RG method successfully mitigated the chemical shift. MDA reduced from 2.52±1.29 mm to 1.11±0.72 mm after the RG correction. The DICE coefficient increased from 0.80±0.13 to 0.91±0.06. A Bland‐Altman plot showed that there was a good agreement between ADC measurements before and after application of the RG correction.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Two distortion correction techniques were evaluated on a commercial low‐field MRgRT system. Overall, the RG correction was able to drastically improve spatial distortion and preserve ADC accuracy.</p></section>

The Investigation of MR Postprocessing Workstation on PC and the Study of the ADC Parameter Image

Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T 1 , T 2 , and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking.

Three-dimensional Simultaneous Brain Mapping of T1, T2, T2*and Magnetic Susceptibility with MR Multitasking

Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking

Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient mappings in amnestic mild cognitive impairment using an image analysis software brain search

The Study of the Multiple Sclerosis by Using MR Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Large Field Diffusion Weighted Imaging on 3.0T MR: Initial Study

Exploring micro-motion in macro-stillness:some insights about clinical application of diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Research on Perfusion Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Pancreatic Masses at 3.0 T MR

Quantification Studies of ADC Value Using 3.0T MR in Normal Rat Brain

Same Brain, Different Look?—The Impact of Scanner, Sequence and Preprocessing on Diffusion Imaging Outcome Parameters

Evaluation of apparent diffuse coefficient (ADC) with regards to reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy as well as possible significance of pre - and post - contrast acquisition and employment of different b values

Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in MR Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Musculoskeletal Tumors

Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the prostate by MR diffusion weighted imaging

Diagnostic value of 3. 0T MR diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer

Application of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Cerebral infarction

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the prostate:preliminary study

Acceleration Strategies for MR-STAT: Achieving High-Resolution Reconstructions on a Desktop PC within 3 minutes

Comparison and evaluation of distortion correction techniques on an MR‐guided radiotherapy system

Comparative Study of Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Normal Liver Parenchyma at 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla MRI

The Applied Research on Respiratory-triggered Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Pancreatic Carcinoma at 3.0T