Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial on Fosfomycin Trometamal Versus Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Urological Tract Bacterial Infections

吕晓菊,宗志勇,冯萍,刘自贵,俞汝佳,裘雁秋,朱淑媛
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0179.2000.02.026
2000-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The efficacy and safty of fosfomycin trometamal versus ciprofloxacin were evaluated through randomized controlled clinical trials on patients with acute urological tract bacterial infections.Method:Twenty-one patients enrolled in trial group and received fosfomycin trometamal 3g QD for 5days;20 in control groups received I ciprofloxacin 250mg Bid for 5 days.Results:The efficacy rate in each group were 95 24% and 90 00%,bacterial eradication rate were 100% and 94 44%,92 31%,adverse events rate were 4 76% and 5 00% respectively.There were no significant differences between the relavant rates ( P 0 05).The sensititvity rate of bacterial isolates to fosfomycin trometamal and ciprofloxacin were 77 77% and 75 00%,mildly higher than that of ciprofloxacin.Conclusion:The results suggested that fosfomycin trometamal with wide antibacterial spectrum,satisfactory activity,is an effective and safe antibiotics in treatment of mild to moderate acute ,urological tract bacterial infections.[WT5”HZ]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?