Abstract:Comparison between off-pump coronary bypass surgery ( OP-CABG )and conventional CABG ( C-CABG ) remains a controversial issue. Objective: To compare short and long term OP-CABG and C-CABG results in high-risk patients ( pts ), in absence of usual bias. Material and methods: A prospective observational study of 752 pts ( 252 pts with C-CABG and 500 with OP-CABG ) consecutively operated throughout 23 months by 4 surgeons largely experienced in both CABG modalities. For comparison of results, two groups ( Gr ) of pts were constituted - GrA, with 252 C-CABG pts, and GrB, with 252 OP-CABG pts - being the pts blindly matched for gender ( female sex - 51 pts ), age ( mean of 65 vs 64 yrs ), angiographic data ( 3 - VD ÷ left main - 92 % vs 90 % ), additive Euroscore ( mean of 4.6 vs 4.6 ), prior myocardial infarction ( 58 % vs 59 % ), history of diabetes ( 48 % vs 49 % ) or hypertension ( 83 % vs 83 % ). Other clinical data ( GrA vs GrB ): left ventricular dysfunction - 39 % vs 34 % ( NS ); logistic Euroscore - mean of 5.4 % vs 5.9 % ( NS ). Surgical results, in-hospital clinical evolution, in-hospital costs ( intra-operative and major post-operative costs ), and short-term ( mean of 50 days ) and long-term ( mean of 5 years ) follow-up were object of evaluation. Results ( GrA vs GrB ): 1 ) Nr of bypasses ÷ pt 2.9 vs 2.4 ( p < 0.01 ); nr of arterial conduits ÷ pt 1.2 vs 1.2; complete revascularization 60 % vs 60 %; surgical total time 155 ± 49 vs 136 ± 42 min ( p < 0.001 ); surgical total time in pts with 3 bypasses 157 ± 41 vs 156 ± 37 min ( NS ). 2 ) In-hospital post-operative evolution: inotropic support ( IS ) 46 % vs 29 % ( p < 0.001 ); heavy IS 14 % vs 6 % ( p < 0.025 ) ; uncomplicated post-operative course 18 % vs 26 % ( p < 0.025 ); significant CV events ( excluding atrial tachyarrhythmias ) 33 % vs 20 % ( p < 0.01 ); infection 22 % vs 14 % ( p < 0.05 ); severe complications 22 % vs 9.5 % ( p < 0.001 ); mean intensive care length of stay 4 vs 3 days ( p < 0.01 ); surgery-to-discharge length of stay 11.3 vs 9.8 days ( p ⋝ 0.05 ); in-hospital mortality ( HM ) 4.4 % vs 2.0 % ( NS ); HM + disabling chronic morbidity 7.5 % vs 3.2 % ( p < 0.05 ) . 3 ) In-hospital costs: intra-operative - superposable; post-operative - excess of about 900 euro ÷ pt in GrA. 4 ) Short-term follow-up: asymptomatic pts - 75 % vs 85 % ( p < 0.025 ); post-discharge complications - 8.3 % vs 7.7 % ( NS ); probability of being alive and asymptomatic + 17 % in GrB ( p < 0.01 ); mortality 0 % vs 0 %. 5 ) Long-term-follow-up ( 87 % vs 90 % pts ), at 5 years: pts alive with no clinical evidence of active coronary artery disease 72 % vs 75 % ( NS ); significant ÷ severe cardiac events of coronary origin 18.8 % vs 9.3 % ( p < 0.025 ); elective PTCA 4.8 % vs 2.3 % ( NS ); all-cause mortality 11.8 % vs 11.9 %; coronary mortality 6.9 % vs 4.4 % ( NS ). Conclusions: In experienced hands and before high-risk pts, OP-CABG offers lesser post-operative risks than C-CABG, with clear and positive consequences on in-hospital costs and short-term follow-up. During long-term follow-up, the revascularization benefits obtained by OP-CABG are not inferior to those conferred by C-CABG, and a significant reduction of the incidence of severe cardiac events can even be seen in a particular subset of pts.

Comparative study on the efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting under cardiac-pulmonary bypass and non-cardiac-pulmonary bypass

Short-term and Long-term Postoperative Safety of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Efficacy of on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft in treatment of coro-nary heart disease

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians With Coronary Artery Disease.

[Advantages of off-pump coronary bypass surgery over conventional coronary bypass surgery]

Comparision of the Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of On-Pump and Off-Pump CABG in High-Euroscore Patients

Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The Surgical Therapy of Senile Patients over the Age of 70 with Coronary Heart Disease

Analysis of 272 consecutive off pump coronary artery bypass patients

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel disease and enlarged ventricles

[A trial to improve operative results of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); off-pump CABG (OPCAB) as standard procedure]

Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Experience in 34 Patients

Early outcomes and clinical experience of 1198 off-pump coronary artery bypass procedure

Clinical Analysis of 1539 Cases Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center

Comparison of anaesthetic management between emergent and selective(off-pump) coronary artery bypass grafting

Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with severely dilated left ventricle.

Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Revascularization Techniques

[Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients over 70 Years Old].

The Clinical Research of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Small Incision at the Left Chest