Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

3D DCE MRA in the Diagnosis of Renal Neoplasm

[Value of 3D-DCE MRA in Diagnosis of Cavernous Transformation of Portal Vein].

Clinical value of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography in diagnosis of angiostenosis after liver transplantation]

Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis with 3D Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography

Differential Diagnosis Between Renal Benign and Malignant Tumors with Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Three-dimensional Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography in Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis:Comparison with DSA

Pilot Study of Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Vascular Patterns of Renal Tumors

Clinical application of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal tumors

Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma with High Magnetic Field MRI in Comparison with Helical CT

Usefulness of3D DCE MRA in detecting shunts drained via renal vein in portal hypertension

A Diagnostic Test of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Elastography Imaging for Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Patients with T1 Stage Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Diagnostic Value and Scanning Technique of Renal Cell Carcinoma with DCE MRI

Evaluating on Imaging for the Vascular Diseases of Extremities

High-Resolution 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Reanl Arteries with Fluoroscopic Triggering and Parallel Acquisition Techniques:Preliminary Experience

Value of 3D DCE MRA for Diagnosis of Aortic Diseases

[Value of Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Renal Solid Renal Lesions].

The Use of Three-section Bed-moving 3D Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRA in Vascular Disease of the Abdomen, Pelvis and Lower Extremity

Three dimensional reconstruction technique of spiral 16 slice CT angiography(CTA) in evaluation of renal artery

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Diagnosis Value of Multislices CT-Urography with 3D Imaging

Two- and Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Assessment of Renal Tumor Vasculature: Preliminary Observations.