Abstract:Objective: To explore the predictive value of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and modified early warning score (MEWS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) of secondary hospitals, and to provide guidance for clinical application. Methods: The clinical data of adult critical patients admitted to the ICU of Wanzhou District First People's Hospital from October 2022 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the clinical outcome of ICU, the patients were divided into improvement group and death group. The general information, blood routine, heart, liver and kidney function indicators, coagulation indicators, blood gas analysis, APACHE II score, SOFA score, qSOFA score, MEWS score at the time of admission to the ICU, the number of cases of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and continuous blood purification (CBP) were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed, and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related factors of death. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze the predictive value of the four scores in ICU patients. Results: A total of 126 patients were included, of which 45 patients died in the ICU and 81 patients improved and transferred out. Univariate analysis of death-related critically ill patients showed that procalcitonin (PCT), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin (ALB), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), D-dimer, pH value, HCO3-, blood lactic acid (Lac), number of patients treated with IMV and CBP, APACHE II score, SOFA score, qSOFA score and MEWS score were significantly different between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the APACHE II score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.115, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.025-1.213, P = 0.011], SOFA score (OR = 1.204, 95%CI was 1.037-1.398, P = 0.015), MEWS score (OR = 1.464, 95%CI was 1.102-1.946, P = 0.009), and APTT (OR = 1.081, 95%CI was 1.015-1.152, P = 0.016) were independent risk factors affecting the mortality of critically ill patients in the ICU. ROC curve analysis showed that APACHE II, SOFA, qSOFA, and MEWS scores could predict the prognosis of critically ill ICU patients, among which SOFA score had the strongest predictive effect, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.808. There was a statistically significant difference in the time required for the four scores (F = 117.333, P < 0.001), among which the MEWS scoring required the shortest time [(1.03±0.39) minutes], and the APACHE II scoring required the longest time [(2.81±1.04) minutes]. Conclusions: APACHE II, SOFA, qSOFA, and MEWS scores can be used to assess the severity of critically ill patients and predict in-hospital mortality. The SOFA score is superior to other scores in predicting severity. The MEWS is preferred because its assessment time is shortest. Early warning score can help secondary hospitals to detect potentially critical patients early and provide help for clinical rapid urgent emergency decision-making.

Prognosis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome estimated by three kinds of scoring system

Study on multiple organ dysfunction syndrome scoring system in evaluating prognosis of patients with MODS

Comparison of Three Different Organ Failure Assessment Score Systems in Predicting Outcome of Severe Sepsis

[Scoring System to Measure the Severity of the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome].

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome scoring system in predicting inhospital mortality

Multi-center Clinical Study on the Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome with Illness Severity Score System

Performance of sequential organ failure assessment, logistic organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction score in severe sepsis within Chinese intensive care units.

Comparison of the Predictive Value of Scoring Systems on the Prognosis of Cirrhotic Patients with Suspected Infection

Clinical Analysis of Mortality and Risk Factor of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

Comparison of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and IV (APACHE) Scoring System Validity as Mortality Predictors in ICU Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Sepsis

The Stardard of Multiple Organ Disfunction Sydrome(draft) Evaluating the Severity of Patients with Mods

A Clinical Study on the Diagnostic Criteria of Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

Risk Factors for Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Severe Stroke Patients

Predictive Value of Multiple Scoring Systems in the Prognosis of Septic Patients with Different Infection Sites: Analysis of the Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care IV Database

Study of different score systems on predicting outcomes in severe patients of emergency departments

Comparison of SAPS 3-PIRO Score with Other Four Scoring Systems for Assessing Sepsis

Comparison of scoring systems: SOFA, APACHE-II, LODS, MODS, and SAPS-II in critically ill elderly sepsis patients

The value of five scoring systems in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure

Clinical Analysis of High Mortality of Acute Renal Failure in Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

[Comparison of four early warning scores in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients in secondary hospitals]

Predicting mortality of elderly patients undergoing open heart surgery with delirium using sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), multi-organ dysfunction (MODS), and logistic organ dysfunction system (LODS) scores