Structure characteristics of methanogenic community produced during the startup of microaerobic baffled reactor

Fei YE,Shengjun WU,Pei HUANG,Yan XIAO,Yu WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.08026

2014-01-01

Chinese Journal of Appplied Environmental Biology

Abstract:The community structure of methanogens produced during operation of a microaerobic baffled reactor was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR and clone library, with an aim to provide a reference basis for the research of the mechanism of pollutants removal. The results showed that the abundance of methanogens in the microaerobic baffled reactor i ncreased generally. With the running of the reactor the removal rate of COD raised from about 30% to about 75%; and the effluent pH changed from weakly acid in the beginning to about 7.3. The abundance of methanogenic MCR gene of the cell 1# treated by micro-oxygen aeration decreased from 1 580 copies ng-1(S1A) to 1 355 copies ng-1(S2A) and then raised to 2 864 copies ng-1(S3A). The abundance of methanogenic MCR gene of the cell 2# showed similar trend with that of the cell 1#, with smaller variation from 2 024 copies ng-1(S1B) to 1 970 copies ng-1(S2B), then to 2 282 copies ng-1(S3B) respectively. The abundance of methanogenic MCR gene of the cell 3# maintained in anaerobic state increased gradually to 3 508 copies ng-1(S3C) in the stable operational stage. The domination of methanogen in the cell 1#(50% of the sequences) was affiliated with the family of Methanobacteriales in the first stage. But the dominant methanogen turned into the family of Methanomicrobiales(80%) in the steady operation. There was no obvious dominant methanogen in the cell 2#, in which the community structure was relatively stable, and the methanogenic sequences affiliated with the family of Methanomicrobiales was 36.4%, 36.4% and 30% respectively in the three different stages. Methanosarcinales were the dominant methanogen(60% in the steady operation) in the cell 3#. At different stages of operation, the b iodiversity was higher in the cell 2# than in cell 1#. The biodiversity of the cell 3# raised in the third stage but did not change abviously in the first two.