Imaging Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch

杨东益,罗建光,李德泰,刘顾岗,喻风雷,汤文华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2001.10.011
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the diagnostic value and limitation of several different imaging methods for the interruption of aortic arch (IAA). Materials and Methods Imaging findings with different modalities in 10 patients of IAA were retrospectively analyzed, and a comparison with each other was made.Results On plain film, it was difficult to diagnose IAA though some suggestive signs could be found. Conventional ascending aortography could confirm the diagnosis and make a classification of IAA, but it was an invasive technique and sometimes several procedures of catheterization might be needed. Cardiac sonography was good at revealing intracardiac malformations, but had limitation in demonstrating the abnormalities of descending aortic arch. Spiral CT angiography (SCTA) could stereoscopically display the complicated anatomic relationship and the malformation in descending aortic arch, but it was helpless in finding intracardiac abnormalities. Electron beam CT (EBCT) was superior to SCTA in evaluating aortic arch, but it was not yet commonly used. MRI was another choice in diagnosing IAA. Conclusion Sonography, combined with SCTA, or EBCT, or MRI, is the most effective diagnostic method for IAA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?