Evaluation of tracheal diameter and angles in fetuses with double aortic arch using prenatal ultrasound: implications for postnatal management
Caihong Jiang,Wen Ling,Longzhuang Peng,Shan Guo,Qiumei Wu,Chunxia Chen,Fa Chen,He Li,Zongjie Weng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1398623
2024-08-30
Abstract:Objective: This study aims to analyze the value of prenatal ultrasound in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of double aortic arch (DAA) malformations. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31 fetal cases with double aortic arch anomalies over a 12-year period from June 1, 2011 to June 1, 2023. The assessment included combined measurements of fetal tracheal internal diameter Z-score and DAA pinch angle, along with ultrasonographic findings, associated anomalies, genetic abnormalities, postnatal CTA images, and long-term postnatal outcomes. Results: Of the 31 fetal double aortic arch cases, 15 were right aortic arch dominant, 2 were left aortic arch dominant, and 14 had a balanced double arch. Genetic testing was performed on 19 cases, revealing abnormalities in 2 cases, including one Turner syndrome, and one carrier of ichthyosis gene with heterozygous deletion. Out of the total cases, 29 were delivered, and 2 cases were terminated. Prenatal diagnosis accurately identified 29 cases (29/31, 93.5%), which was confirmed by postnatal pathological anatomy, echocardiography, surgery or CTA. Fetal tracheal internal diameter Z-scores were significantly smaller in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (-1.27 ± 0.49 vs -0.68 ± 0.60, P = 0.018). The area under the curve was 0.776 (95% confidence interval, 0.593-0.960) using a tracheal internal diameter z-score cutoff of -0.73 with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 64.7%. The double arch pinch angle was significantly smaller in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group [52.50° (38.25° to 59.00°) vs 60.00° (53.50° to 70.50°), P = 0.035]. The area under the curve was 0.744 (95% confidence interval, 0.554-0.935), and the sensitivity for determining the presence or absence of symptoms was 90% when the cutoff value was 62.5°, with a specificity of 47.1%. Fifteen cases opted for surgery with favorable surgical outcome. Conclusion: Prenatal echocardiography demonstrates good diagnostic efficacy for fetal double aortic arch. It is also essential to detect the presence of other underlying intra- and extracardiac malformations and genetic abnormalities. There is a significant difference in prenatal tracheal internal diameter Z-scores and double arch pinch angle between asymptomatic and symptomatic DAA infants. Symptomatic infants require early surgery, while asymptomatic infants should be monitored.