Associated Anomalies and Outcome in Patients with Prenatal Diagnosis of Aortic Arch Anomalies as Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery, Right Aortic Arch and Double Aortic Arch

Roland Axt-Fliedner,Asia Nazar,Ivonne Bedei,Johanna Schenk,Maleen Reitz,Stefan Rupp,Christian Jux,Aline Wolter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030238
IF: 3.6
2024-01-24
Diagnostics
Abstract:We aimed to evaluate retrospectively associated anomalies and outcome in prenatal aortic arch anomalies (AAAs). We included ninety patients with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA), right aortic arch (RAA) with mirror image branching (RAA-mirror) or aberrant left subclavian artery (RAA-ALSA) and double aortic arch (DAA) between 2011 and 2020. In total, 19/90 (21.1%) had chromosomal anomalies, the highest rate being within the ARSA subgroup (17/46, 37%). All (13/13) of the RAA-mirror subgroup, 10/27 (37.0%) of RAA-ALSA, 13/46 (28.3%) of ARSA and 0/4 within the DAA subgroup had additional intracardiac anomaly. The rate of extracardiac anomalies was 30.7% in RAA-mirror, 28.3% in ARSA, 25.0% in DAA and 22.2% in the RAA-ALSA subgroup. A total of 42/90 (46.7%) had isolated AAAs: three (7.1%) with chromosomal anomalies, all trisomy 21 (3/26, 11.5%) within the ARSA subgroup. Out of 90, 19 (21.1%) were lost to follow-up (FU). Two (2.2%) intrauterine deaths occurred, and six (6.7%) with chromosomal anomalies terminated their pregnancy. In total, 63 (70.0%) were liveborn, 3/63 (4.8%) with severe comorbidity had compassionate care and 3/60 (5.0%) were lost to FU. The survival rate in the intention-to-treat cohort was 53/57 (93%). Forty-one (77.4%) presented with vascular ring/sling, two (4.9%) with RAA-ALSA developed symptoms and one (2.4%) needed an operation. We conclude that intervention due to vascular ring is rarely necessary. NIPT could be useful in isolated ARSA cases without higher a priori risk for trisomy 21 and after exclusion of other anomalies.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main aim of this paper is to retrospectively evaluate the associated anomalies and prognosis of various types of aortic arch anomalies (AAAs) diagnosed prenatally. The study included 90 patients, who were divided into four groups: Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery (ARSA), Right Aortic Arch with Mirror Image Branching (RAA-mirror), Right Aortic Arch with Aberrant Left Subclavian Artery (RAA-ALSA), and Double Aortic Arch (DAA). Specifically, the study attempts to address the following issues: 1. **Evaluation of associated genetic anomalies**: The study found that approximately 21.1% of all patients had additional chromosomal abnormalities, with the highest proportion in the ARSA subgroup (37%), particularly with a higher incidence of Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome). 2. **Evaluation of associated intracardiac anomalies**: The study showed that all patients (100%) in the RAA-mirror subgroup had additional intracardiac anomalies, followed by the RAA-ALSA subgroup (37%) and the ARSA subgroup (28.3%). No patients in the DAA subgroup had intracardiac anomalies. 3. **Evaluation of associated extracardiac anomalies**: The incidence of extracardiac anomalies in the RAA-mirror, ARSA, DAA, and RAA-ALSA subgroups was 30.7%, 28.3%, 25.0%, and 22.2%, respectively. 4. **Evaluation of isolated AAAs characteristics**: 46.7% of patients (42/90) had only AAAs without other anomalies, with the incidence of Trisomy 21 in isolated ARSA patients being 11.5%. 5. **Evaluation of the necessity of interventions**: The study concluded that interventions due to vascular rings are rarely needed, and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) may be useful for isolated ARSA cases, especially for those without a higher prior risk of Trisomy 21, after excluding other anomalies. In summary, this paper focuses on a detailed analysis of different types of aortic arch anomalies to better understand their clinical significance, associated complications, and their impact on the long-term prognosis of patients.