Pathological invasiveness of lung adnenocarcinomas presenting as ground-glass opacity with different proportion of consolidation

齐丽萍,张晓鹏,孙应实,李晓婷,孙宇,唐磊,曹崑,高顺禹
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13929/j.1003-3289.2014.10.022
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference of pathological invasiveness between lung adnenocarcinomas presenting as ground-glass opacity(GGO) with different proportion of consolidation.Methods CT and pathological data of 59 patients with adenocarcinoma confirmed by pathology presenting as GGO on CT were retrospectively studied.The thin-slice images of the focal lesions were analyzed and according to the maximal diameter ratio of the consolidation and the tumor,the patients were divided into main GGO group(G_G) and main consolidation group(G_C).The CT features and pathological invasiveness of the tumor were observed and compared.Results The diameter of the lesions was(2.71±1.08)cm.There were 8 of pure GGOs and 51 of mixed GGOs.Bubble-like low attenuation appeared in 43(43/59,72.88%) cases and most of the lesions(53/59,89.83%) had clear margin.There were 19 cases in G_G group and 40 cases in G_C group.CT features:There was not obvious difference of the tumor diameter,location,shape and clear margin between the two groups(all P0.05).The ratios of lobulated and(or) burr margin,sign of bubble-like attenuation and pleural indentation in G_C group were higher than those in G_G group(all P0.05).Pathology results:No differences of lymph node metastasis and cancer embolus were found(both P0.05) between the two groups.The rate of pleural invasion and the pathological staging were higher in G_C group than those in G_G group(both P0.05).Conclusion With increasing of the solid component ratio in lung adenocarcinas presenting as GGO,the lesions are tended to demonstrate malignant features in CT and high invasiveness in pathology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?