Evaluation of Diagnosing Slow-Fast(s-f) Atrio-Ventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT) Using Transesophagel Atrial Pacing

张雪莲,马依彤,张燕一
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2004.01.011
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To discuss the value of transesophagel atrial pacing (TEAP) in diagnosing slow-fast (S-F) atrioventricular nodal reen-trant tachycardia (AVNRT) and discover the rate of coincidence with TEAP and electrophysiological study(EPS). Methods: 128 patients were examined with transesophageal atrial pacing (TEAP),electrophysiological study(EPS)before and after radiofrequency ablation. Results: (1) The rate of the coincidence in diagnosing S-F AVNRT with TEAP and EPS is 98.67%.The sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive value were 98.67%,100.00%,100.00%,98.15% respectively.(2)The diagnostic ability of S\-2R jump≥60ms for AVNRT was limited relatively.(3)The RP′ intervals ≤70ms and 70ms were useful parameters in diagnosing and distinguishing AVNRT and O-AVRT and the sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive value were from 85.71% to 100.00%. (4) The rate of inducing of near Wenckebach conduction S\-1S\-1 is higher than that of S\-1S\-2. Conclusions: (1) TEAP and EPS are highly identical in diagnosing S-F AVNRT. (2) S\-2R jump is not a reliable parameter in diagnosing AVNRT. (3) The RP′ interval ≤70ms was useful parameters in diagnosing and distinguishing S-F AVNRT and O-AVRT. (4) The rate of inducing of near Wenckebach conduction S\-1S\-1 is higher than that of S\-1S\-2.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?