Electrophysiologic Mechanism and Radiofrequency Ablation of Slow/slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

WANG Zu-lu,Jackman WM,HAN Ya-ling,LIANG Yan-chun,LIANG Ming,XU Kai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2005.01.006
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the electrophysiologic mechanism and the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation in slow/slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT).Methods Eight hundred and twelve patients with AVNRT referred for ablation were divided into 2 groups.Group 1 consisted of 500 patients.The electrophysiologic properties and the sites with successful ablation between the retrograde slow pathway(retro-SP)and the antegrade SP(ante-SP)in slow/slow AVNRT were compared,and the successful ablation sites of (retro-SP) between slow/slow and fast/slow AVNRT were also compared.In group 1 patients with slow/slow AVNRT,the (retro-SP) was initially ablated. Group 2 consisted of 312 patients.Based on the hypothesis of the reentrant circuit for slow/slow AVNRT,the ante-SP was prospectively ablated by electroanatomic guided approach despite the existence of the (retro-SP) in slow/slow AVNRT,and the successful ablation site for ante-SP and the earliest atrial insertion site of (retro-SP) were compared.Results In group 1,59 patients had slow/slow AVNRT and 54 patients had fast/slow AVNRT.In slow/slow AVNRT,the (ante-SP) and (retro-SP) conduction time during tachycardia and the successful ablation sites between ante-SP and (retro-SP) were significantly different.The (retro-SP) was mostly ablated at the CS ostium or within the proximal CS and the ante-SP was mostly ablated between the tricuspid annulus and CS.The conduction time,the decremental properties and the successful ablation sites of the retro-SP between slow/slow and fast/slow AVNRT were all significantly different.In group 2,slow/slow AVNRTwas successfully eliminated in all 22 patients targeting the ante-SP by electroanatomic guided approach.After ablation of ante-SP,the retro-SP conduction had no change in 21 slow/slow AVNRT patients.During follow-up,6 of the 59 patients with slow/slow AVNRT in ( )group 1 had recurrence,and no recurrence in the 22 patients with slow/slow AVNRT in group 2.Conclusions (①In slow/slow) AVNRT,the ante-SP and (retro-SP) have markedly different electrophysiologic properties and anatomical distributions,and the anatomical substrates for the (ante-SP) and retro-SP are most likely the right posterior extension and the left posterior extension of the AV node respectively;②In slow/slow AVNRT,ablation of ante-SP using electroanatomic guided approach has a high successful rate and a low recurrence rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?