Abstract:AIM: To study the characteristic of the normal multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and to test the ability of mfVEP in detecting glaucoma using the mfVEP from normal is subjects, glaucomatous patients. METHODS: mfVEPs of 32 normal eyes (n=21) and 58 eyes (n=37) with primary glaucoma were recorded with the Vision Monitor electrophysical apparatus by the second kernel analysis. Humphrey automated visual fields (HVF) were also obtained from the eyes with glaucoma to determine the correlation between them. RESULTS: 1.The study showed that signals in the center zone of the normal had the largest amplitudes (194.32±126.21nV/deg2). There was little effect of age on the amplitudes and latent time and no difference was found between the two eyes, while the amplitudes of female (19.41±5.27 nV/deg2) were larger than that of the male (10.12±2.83 nV/deg2) (P<0.05);2. There was significant interindividual variability (the coefficient of variation was 43.05%) in mfVEP amplitudes in the normal subjects but the variability within two eyes of the same individual was small;3. The amplitudes of eyes with glaucoma were smaller than that of the normal eyes and significantly statistical difference were found in the 0-10°ring zone (P<0.05) while no difference of the latent time was observed between them; 4. If the two eyes of one patient with glaucoma were damaged to the same extent, the amplitudes of the two eyes were almost the same; while not to the same extent the amplitudes were different. 5.The summation values of mfVEP amplitudes and HVF mean deviation values was strongly correlated (rs = -0.487,P=0.000).The established glaucoma eyes with field defect were also confirmed in the mfVEP and the correlation of the topographic location was good. CONCLUSION: The large individual variability of mfVEP responses limits the detecting of the early field defect by the simple signal comparison between the normal subjects and the patients with glaucoma. By using intereye asymmetry analysis the early visual field defect may be detected as for the damages within the two eyes are not the same or only one eye is damaged. The measurement is not applicable to both eyes damaged to the same extent. For the established glaucomatous eyes, the amplitudes of the mfVEP descend and has a strong correlation with the MD value, which to some extent may offset the shortage of the automated visual field.

The Characteristics of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential in Healthy Individuals

Multifocal visual evoked potential in normal eyes and the primary glaucoma

[Retinal symmetry of multifocal visual evoked potential in both eyes of normal subjects].

Multifocal Vep In Patients With Optic Nerve Disease

The comparison of mfVEP in normal eyes and glaucomatous eyes

Application of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential in the Diagnosis of Primary Glaucoma

The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields?

Characteristics of Visual Evoked Potential in Different Parts of Visual Impairment

How to Use of Visual Evoked Potential Testing Technology Reasonable

Characteristic changes of multifocal visual evoked potential in exotropias

The study of multifocal VEP in amblyopia

Application of multifocal visual evoked potential in the diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma

Effect of experimental scotoma on multifocal visual evoked potential

Characteristics of multifocal electroretinogram in normal children

Investigation of characteristic changes in anisometropic amblyopia by multifocal VEP.

[The PRVEPs Evoked by Different Fields Stimulation].

The Evaluation of Visual Function in Patients with Various Degrees of Myopia Using Multifocal Electroretinogram

The use of the multifocal electroretinogram in retinal diseases

Assessment Of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review

Characteristics of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential in Two Eyes with Varying Visual Acuity in One Eye and Forensic Application

[Multifocal Electroretinogram in Cystoid Macular Edema].