The Independence of Compensation Committees and the Higher Reward Given to Managers: the Sensitivity of Performance——An Analysis and a Test Both Based on the Hypothesis of the Justifying Compensation
Xie Deren,Lin Le,Chen Yunsen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2012.01.012
2012-01-01
Abstract:In this paper, we have put forward and preliminarily and empirically tested the "Justifying Compensation Hypothe-sis" (JCH). First of all, we have, in this paper, put forward the JCH, and, on this basis, put forward our hypothesisabout the Son of the JCH: when managers have the demand for justifying compensation (JC) and relatively great abilityto impact on the establishment of policies for company' s reward, and when the net effect of the JC increases, managerswill increase the degree of the sensitivity of reward-performance to justify "the justification of the results". We haveexamined the above-mentioned "Son" and discovered that, in the nation- controlled listed companies in which manag-ers' demand for JC is eager, compared with firms in which managers do not hold a concurrent post of being a memberof the reward committee, the degree of the sensitivity of reward-performance of managers who hold a concurrent post ofbeing a member of the reward committee is obviously much higher, that the relationship between managers holdingsuch a post and the still higher degree of the sensitivity of reward-performance finds its expression mainly in compa-nies that give high pay to their employees and have relatively better performance and whose location is the area wherethe degree of commercialization is relatively low, which shows that the increase in managers' degree of the sensitivity of reward-performance is because of managers' demand for the JC, and that increase mentioned above is an expres-sion of managers' selfishness. In this paper, we have offered some preliminary experiential proofs. What should bepointed out is that, although the deduction and the finding of the hypothesis in this paper are different from the antici-pation of the agents theory of the mainstream, the results of our study do not mean that, considered from the economicconsequence, still higher is the agent cost of national controlling listed companies in which managers hold a concurrentpost of being a member of the reward committee.