Meta-analysis of Hemodynamic Optimization in Early Critical Patients

Jack Kern,WC.Shoemaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2003.09.011

2003-01-01

Abstract:Objective The aim of study was to review pertinent randomized controlled studies that described the relationship between hemodynamic optimization and resuscitation guided by Swan-Ganz values in acute,critically ill patients and evaluate outcome of therapy in association with physiology,clinical,and therapeutic influences Methods MEDLINE was the source of randomized controlled studies written in English The included criteria were:①Acutely ill,high-risk surgery,and trauma;②The goals of therapy were to resuscitate to either normal of supranormal values;③Control group mortality20% or15%;④The time that were implemented(i e ,“early,”12 hrs postoperatively or before organ failure,vs “late,”or after onset of organ failure) 21 of 72 studies were selected for Meta-analysis Results In severely ill patients (control group mortality 20%),6 studies had a 23% mortality difference ( P 0 05)between the control and protocol groups with early optimization,but 7 studies optimized after the development of organ failure did not have significantly improved mortality Moreover,outcome was not significantly improved in less severely ill patients (control group mortality15%)and normal values as goals or when therapy did not improve oxygen delivery Conclusion Review of 21 randomized controlled trials with various approaches to treatment revealed statistically significant mortality reduction,with hemodynamic optimization,when patients with acute critical illness were treated early to achieve optimal goals before the development of organ failure,when there were control group mortality20% and when therapy produced differences in oxygen delivery between the control and protocol groups [