Mechanism of protective effect of Shengmai injection on intestinal mucosa during hemorrhagic shock in rabbits

夏中元,罗涛,夏芳,刘先义,黄海波

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-1416.2001.05.011

2001-01-01

Abstract:Objective Shengmai injection (SM) is a preparation of traditional Chinese herbal medicine with tonic action and has been effectively used in the treatment of different types of shock. The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanism of its protective effect on intestinal mucosa during shock in rabbits. Methods 21 healthy rabbits of both sexes weighing 2.0-2.5 kg were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium 30 μg@ kg-1 and fentanyl 10 μg@ kg-1 iv. The animals were tracheotomised and intubated and mechanically ventilated. PET CO2 was maintained between 4.687-5.33 kPa. Left femoral artery was cannulated for measurement of BP, blood withdrawal and blood sampling. A catheter was inserted into portal vein for portal vein blood gas analysis. Tonometer probe was placed in sigmoid colon for measurement of pHi. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by blood withdrawal from femoral artery at a rate of 2ml@ kg-1 @ min -1 until MAP dropped to 5.33 kPa. MAP was maintained at this level for 60 min then the collected blood was returned to the animal. The rabbits were divided into 3 groups of 7 animals each: group A: hemorrhagic shock was induced and maintained for 60 min. SM 2.1 ml@ kg -1 was diluted and slowly infused with the returned blood; group B: hemorrhagic shock was induced and maintained for 60 min as in group A but no SM was given. group C: sham operation without shock. Intestinal pH (pHi) and intestinal ERO2 were measured before shock (S0), 1 h after shock(S1 ), 1 h (R1) and 3 h (R3) after collected blood was returned. A segment of ileum (6 cm) was removed at R3 and NO, MDA and Ca2+ contents of intestinal mucosa were measured. Intestinal mucosa damage was graded by microscopic examination.Results pHi and intestinal ERO2 were higher in group A than those in group B at R1 and R3. NO, MDA and Ca2+ contents of intestinal mucosa in group B were significantly higher than those in group A and C.Intestinal mucosal damage was slight in group A as compared with that in group B. There was a good negative correlation between pHi and intestinal mucosa damage ( r = - 0.841, P ＜ 0.05 ). Conclusions The results show that SM can protect intestinal mucosa from ischemia-reperfusion injury during hemorrhagic shock through improving perfusion and oxygenation, inhibiting the activities of NO and reducing oxygen free radicals and calcium overload.