Predictive Value of Clinical Influence on Angiographic In-Stent Restenosis after Coronary Stent Placement

王晖,杨志健,马根山,朱铁兵,尹航,王连生,曹克将,黄峻
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1439.2003.01.008
2003-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the predictive value of clinical influence on 6 month clinical and angiographic in stent restenosis after coronary stent placement.Methods:Patients who underwent successful coronary stenting were taken reangiography during 6 month follow up period. (Because larger part of patients in our study had recurrence of angina with less part of patients remained angina free, so we had much higher in stent restenosis than it actually had). Clinical (age, gender, coronary risk factors, serum levels of lipids and lipoprotein), quantitative angiographic (lesion localization, morphology, pre and postangioplastic minimal lumen diameter, reference diameter, and percent diameter stenosis), together with the clinical performance of unstable angina and its risk classification were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results:On the basis of preprocedual angiography, 110 patients with a total of 141 lesions received stent placement. At 6 months follow up, 67 patients ( 60.9 %) with 83 lesions ( 58.8 %) developed in stent restenosis as checked by coronary angiography. Multivariate analysis revealed minimal lumen diameter and AHA/ACC lesion type preprocedural to be independently associated with in stent restenosis during follow up periods. (OR: 0.120 and 2.642 ).Conclusion:Angiographic anatomy of coronary lesion preprocudural is associated with in stent restenosis, while minimal lumen diameter and AHA/ACC lesion type are two independently factors in evaluating the prognostic of stent placement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?