Relative Factors of Restenosis in Coronary Stent

郭军,程祖亨,杨新春,王乐丰,霍勇,葛永贵,王红石,佟子川,邹阳春,李惟铭,徐立,王立忠,连勇
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2004.03.014
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The aim of this article was to identify clinical?lesional characteristics and procedural elements relation to in-stent restenosis. Methods: Clinical and radiographic data of 107 patients with successfully coronary stent placement at the Center of Cardiology of Beijing Chao Yang and BeiDa Hosptial were retrospectively analysed and measured between January 1999 and October 2002. In-stent restenosis was 63 patients, no-restenosis was 44 patients, 211 lesions was seen in all patients, and 182 stents was placed in 107 patients. In-stent restenosis was defenited as a diameter stenosis ≥50% at follow-up. The correlates of restenosis were analysed by binary logistic regression. Results: Multivariate analysis demonatrated that diabetes mellitus (OR valuve 1.82, 95% CI: 1.60~2.58)?lesion length (OR valuve 1.44, 95% CI: 1.17~1.87)?minimal lumen diameter (MLD) after procedure (OR valuve 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03 ~0.8) and multiple stents (OR valuve 2.34, 95% CI: 1.20~5.44) were relation to in-stent restenosis (P0.05). Diabetes mellitus? lesion length and multiple stents were risk factors for it (P0.05), however, MLD was inverse relation to in-stent restenosis (P0.05). Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus?lesion length and multiple stents could be risk factors for in-stent restenosis, which increased risk of in-stent restenosis, however, MLD may attenuate in-stent restenosis. Achieving an optimal result with single stent may reduce rate of in-stent restenosis in patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?