Comparative Study of Three Closure Methods for Femoral Artery Access Site in Interventional Therapeutic Procedures for Senile Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

刘鹏,卢才义,刘玲玲,晏沐阳,李玉峰,吴兴利,王士雯

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2004.03.014

2004-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the merits and demerits of three different closure methods for femoral artery access site in the interventional therapeutic procedures for senile patients with coronary artery disease. Methods We managed the femoral artery access sites in 60 cases undergoing interventional operation using three different hemostasias, including manual compression, Femostop equipment and Perclose suture (20 cases for each group). The procedure time, time for patients staying in bed, expenditure obedience, the percentage of procedure failure and vagal vascular reflex, and local vascular complications were observed and analyzed statistically. Results The study showed that the procedure time in Perclose suture group was about 12 minutes, much shorter than that in finger pressing and Femostop equipment groups (respectively 23 and 55 minutes, P0.05). The patients in Perclose suture group just needed around 3 hours to stay in bed, shortening about 20 hours more than the other groups (both P0.05). The obedience of patients in Perclose suture group was also better than others. There was no significant difference in vascular complications. Conclusion Perclose suture could stanch femoral artery access site thoroughly and not cause vagal vascular reflex. Patients accepting this hemostasia had less local vascular complications and reactivated sooner. It is an ideal local hemostasia for the patients undergoing interventional therapeutic procedures but not bearing to stay in bed for a long time.