Influences of hemostatic methods on vascular complications after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention
Yuan-yuan FAN,Bo ZHENG,Xin-gang WANG,Bin ZHANG,Ming CHEN,Yong HUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1674-4055.2015.01.16
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To review the safety of 3 kinds of vascular hemostats (angioseal, perclose and radial hemostat) and traditional manual compression (MC) applied during coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods The patients undergone CAG or PCI [n=4717, male 3018 (64.1%), female 1699 (35.9%) and average age:60.6±10.3] were chosen from Jan. 1, 2007 to Jan. 1, 2013, and then divided into 4 groups including angioseal group (n=1011), perclose group (n=1000), MC group (n=1677) and radial hemostat group (n=1029). The incidence rates of major or secondary vascular complications were compared, and risk factors of vascular complications were analyzed. Results There were totally 10 cases with major vascular complications and all of them in MC group. Compared with MC group, the incidence rates of hematoma, bleeding, vagal reflex and vasospasm decreased, and those of thrombosis and vascular occlusion increased in angioseal group and perclose group (all P<0.05). Compared with MC group, the incidence rate of pweudo aneurysm increased in perclose group, and incidence rates of arterial dissection and arterovenous fistula decreased in angioseal group. Taken MC group as control, radial hemostat (OR=0.35,95%CI:0.25~0.49) and angioseal (OR=0.26, 95%CI:0.25~0.49) had significantly lower risk of secondary vascular complications (all P<0.001), and perclose (OR=0.71, 95%CI:0.54~0.93, P=0.013) had low risk. The risk of secondary vascular complications was lower in the patients with transradial hemostat (OR=0.49, 95%CI:0.36~0.69) than that in those with transfemoral hemostat. Age (OR=1.06, 95%CI:1.01~1.04), female (OR=2.33, 95%CI:1.58~2.64), hypertension (OR=1.81, 95%CI:1.23-2.23 and decrease of creatinine clearance rate (OR=0.94, 95%CI:0.95~0.97) were risk factors of secondary vascular complications after CAG or PCI. Conclusion Vascular hemostats, compared with MC, can significantly reduce incidence of vascular complications, and transradial hemostat has higher safety compared with transfemoral hemostat.